Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, 20 Jan 2021 22:56 +00:00: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:16 AM Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> > wrote: > > How about linking to mail-archives.apache.org, or to a sane third- > > party archive? I know lists.a.o is "official" but unless it has > > changed its spots since I last looked, I'd have zero problems with > > linking to other archives. The javascript-wall is just one issue. > > The biggest thing that drives me up the wall with lists.a.o is the > mile-long URLs. The only reason I use them is because I've heard > whisperings that this is ASF's preferred long-term archive and the > other one might disappear someday. But I would it be the other way > around. > > > You can prototype/test this on /site/staging. (Remember you may need to > > sync-merge from /site/publish first. BTW, that branch needs a BRANCH-README > > file and a mention of https://subversion-staging.a.o/ therein…) > > Why does staging need a BRANCH-README? Isn't it better to document its > purpose and URL in HACKING (if it isn't already)?
In order to have a mention of https://subversion-staging.a.o/ therein, as I said. That's where I expected to find that URL, anyway. Didn't remember it was in the main README, as Daniel just said.
