Re: Last-Modified HTTP header in GET responses

2016-01-05 Thread Greg Stein
Personally, I'd be more interested in the effects on the network and its caching ability. Do we really need to save CPU/IO on the server? Today's servers seem more than capable, and are there really svn servers out in the wild getting so crushed, that this is important? It seems that as long as pro

Re: detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2016-01-05 Thread Stefan
On 1/5/2016 15:56, Julian Foad wrote: Ping!... Stefan H or Stefan F, is there anything further to report on this issue? I'll have to retest the current trunk against the test case to check out the current state. Quite busy atm though, so donno if I can squeeze it in this week. Will do though, u

Re: [RFC/PATCH] Handling PROPFIND in mod_dav_svn (was: Re: Issue with browsing a SVN 1.9.2, schema 7, packed, repository)

2016-01-05 Thread Evgeny Kotkov
Daniel Shahaf writes: >> I'm aware of two possible ways of solving the problem: >> >> (1) Fix mod_dav, adjust mod_dav_svn accordingly >> >> (2) Reimplement PROPFIND in mod_dav_svn >> [...] > Wait a minute. Isn't "we have few active committers" a reason for > choosing (1) over (2)? I would n

Re: detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2016-01-05 Thread Julian Foad
Ping!... Stefan H or Stefan F, is there anything further to report on this issue? - Julian On 25 August 2015, Stefan Hett wrote: > On 17 August 2015, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015, Stefan Hett wrote: >>> I came across a case where svn-normalizer did remove mergeinfo for a >>> br

Re: svn commit: r1723003 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

2016-01-05 Thread James McCoy
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:42:38PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: james...@apache.org [mailto:james...@apache.org] > > Sent: dinsdag 5 januari 2016 05:59 > > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > > Subject: svn commit: r1723003 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/S

RE: svn commit: r1723003 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

2016-01-05 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: james...@apache.org [mailto:james...@apache.org] > Sent: dinsdag 5 januari 2016 05:59 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1723003 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS > > Author: jamessan > Date: Tue Jan 5 04:58:36 2016 > New Revision: