On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:42:38PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: dinsdag 5 januari 2016 05:59 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: svn commit: r1723003 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS > > > > Author: jamessan > > Date: Tue Jan 5 04:58:36 2016 > > New Revision: 1723003 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1723003&view=rev > > Log: > > * STATUS: Nominate r1721488. > > > > Modified: > > subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS > > > > Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS > > URL: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS?rev=1723 > > 003&r1=1723002&r2=1723003&view=diff > > ========================================================== > > ==================== > > --- subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS (original) > > +++ subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS Tue Jan 5 04:58:36 2016 > > @@ -122,6 +122,13 @@ Candidate changes: > > Votes: > > +1: jamessan > > > > + * r1721488, r1721648 > > + Enable building bindings with SWIG >= 3.0.6 > > + Justification: > > + Enable building bindings with SWIG 3.x > > + Votes: > > + +1: jamessan > > I think this nomination needs another addition and/or a backport branch.
Yeah, I noticed the backport-conflicts failure. danielsh made some changes in trunk to fail if --with-swig is given but swig isn't found, which haven't been backported. I'll revisit that tonight. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <[email protected]>
