Re: [Issue 4334] New - move-update not setting last_mod_time in destination

2013-03-11 Thread Philip Martin
"Bert Huijben" writes: >> svn up --accept postpone -r1 wc >> >> A/f has lost_mod_time cleared, thats OK. A2/f unchanged and still has >> last_mod_time. > > A/f should be shadowed with a base-delete layer that doesn't have mod_time > and translated size set? > (And should still have it at its or

RE: [Issue 4334] New - move-update not setting last_mod_time in destination

2013-03-11 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: phi...@tigris.org [mailto:phi...@tigris.org] > Sent: maandag 11 maart 2013 18:17 > To: iss...@subversion.tigris.org > Subject: [Issue 4334] New - move-update not setting last_mod_time in > destination > > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43

Re: [PATCH] Update CHANGES file to have a note about '--include-externals' option for svn list

2013-03-11 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 03/11/2013 09:22 AM, vijay wrote: > * CHANGES: List the new '--include-externals' option for >'svn list' (issue #4225). > > Patch by: Vijayaguru G SendingCHANGES Transmitting file data . Committed revision 1455142. Thanks, Vijay! -- C. Michael Pilato CollabNet <> www.co

[PATCH] Update CHANGES file to have a note about '--include-externals' option for svn list

2013-03-11 Thread vijay
Hi, This patch updates the CHANGES file to have a note about the new option '--include-externals' added to 'svn list'. Attached the patch and log message. Thanks & Regards, Vijayaguru * CHANGES: List the new '--include-externals' option for 'svn list' (issue #4225). Patch by: Vijayaguru

Re: Confusion to svn_kind_t!

2013-03-11 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 01:44:50PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > Unless someone can thing of a really good reason why that wouldn't work, > I propose to implement that plan and merge svn_node_kind_t with svn_kind_t. Absolutely fine with me.

Re: [PATCH] correct installation of mod_dontdothat

2013-03-11 Thread Branko Čibej
On 11.03.2013 13:38, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:33:09 +: >> Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >> [...] >>> FWIW, it would have been nice to see a diff of build-outputs.mk as >>> well... >> Hi Daniel. Here's the change to build-outputs.mk as seen on my Ubuntu 12.0

Re: Adding CHECK to NODES?

2013-03-11 Thread Julian Foad
  -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download - Original Message - > From: Philip Martin > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Monday, 4 March 2013, 5:43 > Subject: Re: Adding CHECK to NODES? > > Philip Martin writes: >

Re: Confusion to svn_kind_t!

2013-03-11 Thread Branko Čibej
On 11.03.2013 13:14, Bert Huijben wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] >> Sent: maandag 11 maart 2013 12:59 >> To: Branko Čibej >> Cc: Subversion Development >> Subject: Re: Confusion to svn_kind_t! >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:25:11AM +0100, Bran

Re: [PATCH] correct installation of mod_dontdothat

2013-03-11 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:33:09 +: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > [...] > > FWIW, it would have been nice to see a diff of build-outputs.mk as > > well... > > Hi Daniel.  Here's the change to build-outputs.mk as seen on my Ubuntu 12.04 > system: > Thanks Julian! > [[[ > $ d

RE: Confusion to svn_kind_t!

2013-03-11 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: maandag 11 maart 2013 12:59 > To: Branko Čibej > Cc: Subversion Development > Subject: Re: Confusion to svn_kind_t! > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:25:11AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > > As I've been updating JavaH

Re: Confusion to svn_kind_t!

2013-03-11 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:25:11AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > As I've been updating JavaHL for 1.8, I tripped over the new svn_kind_t > enum. Since it not only replaces svn_node_kind_t but also changes the > values of the equivalent enumeration constants, maintaining backward > compatibility in J

Re: [PATCH] correct installation of mod_dontdothat

2013-03-11 Thread Julian Foad
Daniel Shahaf wrote: [...] > FWIW, it would have been nice to see a diff of build-outputs.mk as > well... Hi Daniel.  Here's the change to build-outputs.mk as seen on my Ubuntu 12.04 system: [[[ $ diff -U1 install-*.mk --- install-mods-shared.build-outputs.mk    2013-03-11 07:24:30.

Re: Confusion to svn_kind_t!

2013-03-11 Thread Branko Čibej
On 11.03.2013 11:46, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:25:11 +0100: >> As I've been updating JavaHL for 1.8, I tripped over the new svn_kind_t >> enum. Since it not only replaces svn_node_kind_t but also changes the >> values of the equivalent enumeration constant

Re: Confusion to svn_kind_t!

2013-03-11 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:25:11 +0100: > As I've been updating JavaHL for 1.8, I tripped over the new svn_kind_t > enum. Since it not only replaces svn_node_kind_t but also changes the > values of the equivalent enumeration constants, maintaining backward > compatibility in Java

Confusion to svn_kind_t!

2013-03-11 Thread Branko Čibej
As I've been updating JavaHL for 1.8, I tripped over the new svn_kind_t enum. Since it not only replaces svn_node_kind_t but also changes the values of the equivalent enumeration constants, maintaining backward compatibility in JavaHL is going to be a bit of a pain. Do we really need a new enumera

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

2013-03-11 Thread Sergei Antonov
>> Well, I took apr-util-1.5.1-win32-src.zip and dsw/dsp were generated. >> Then I opened .dsw in VS 2010, did a conversion, and tried to build. >> Nothing except zlib compiles, with a lot of "Cannot open include file: >> 'svn_private_config.h'" errors. Did I miss some step that generates >> this f