Gabriela Gibson wrote on Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 22:37:35 +:
> On 19/02/13 13:06, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> I see. The interesting part is that I asked about
>> AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .html
>> because httpd.conf has it enabled for us specifically. I Also tested by
>> hand and confirmed that
Shivani Poddar wrote on Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 04:00:34 +0530:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Shivani Poddar wrote on Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 00:28:41 +0530:
> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Shivani P
[ [ [
Improving support for svn_checksum.h in SWIG bindings.
* subversion/bindings/swig/python/tests/checksum.py: "swig-py: Adding tests for
svn_checksum_dup() and svn_checksum_match()"
Patch by: Shivani Poddar
Review by : breser
] ] ]
Regards,
Shivani Poddar,
irc-nik -> trinity_28
I
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Shivani Poddar
> wrote:
> > I see. I did run an 'svn update' on my working copy before making any new
> > changed this time around.
> > Maybe i'll recheck the diff yes.
>
> If Subversion can apply the changes (o
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Shivani Poddar
wrote:
> I see. I did run an 'svn update' on my working copy before making any new
> changed this time around.
> Maybe i'll recheck the diff yes.
If Subversion can apply the changes (or at least thinks it can)
without creating a conflict it will do
On 19/02/13 13:06, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
I see. The interesting part is that I asked about
AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .html
because httpd.conf has it enabled for us specifically. I Also tested by
hand and confirmed that /www/subversion.apache.org/index2.html has SSI
directives parsed even if
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Shivani Poddar
> wrote:
> > Maybe writing "adding tests for svn_checksum_dup() function in
> > svn_checksum.h would be the correct thing to do.
>
> Yes. I'd probably say something like "swig-py: Adding tests f
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Shivani Poddar wrote on Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 00:28:41 +0530:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Shivani Poddar
> > > wrote:
> > > > [ [ [
> > > >
> > > > Improving support for s
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Shivani Poddar
wrote:
> Maybe writing "adding tests for svn_checksum_dup() function in
> svn_checksum.h would be the correct thing to do.
Yes. I'd probably say something like "swig-py: Adding tests for
svn_checksum_dup()"
> Since in the earlier patches we had L
Shivani Poddar wrote on Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 00:28:41 +0530:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Shivani Poddar
> > wrote:
> > > [ [ [
> > >
> > > Improving support for svn_checksum.h in SWIG bindings.
> >
> > This isn't how I'd word this c
Peelman, Nick wrote on Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 13:59:59 -0500:
> Using both sendmail and an internal SMTP server (postfix), neither the
> date nor message ID would get inserted; that said, the foreign MTA
> would spawn a message-ID and a date.
>
OK. Fair enough. I'm convinced that these headers s
Using both sendmail and an internal SMTP server (postfix), neither the date nor
message ID would get inserted; that said, the foreign MTA would spawn a
message-ID and a date.
However:
As per RFC2822, the Date field is one of only two required fields for a valid
message; relying on the MTA to
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Peelman, Nick wrote on Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 13:13:28 -0500:
>> Adds a Date header and a Message-ID with the revision property embedded at
>> the end.
>
> Why is this necessary? Can you describe a setup in which Date or
> Message-ID are not
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Shivani Poddar
> wrote:
> > [ [ [
> >
> > Improving support for svn_checksum.h in SWIG bindings.
>
> This isn't how I'd word this commit description. You haven't actually
> improved support at all with this pa
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> How so? If the proxy caches the master version per-process or
> per-connection, it won't need to be restarted to notice master upgrades,
> will it?
Per-connection would be fine but based on the discussion in the thread
I was presuming per-
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> My "trunk" working copy had the WC upgraded by running the JavaHL test
> suite. I can live with it, but it means I have to change PATH before
> updating my WC. I've been doing this for a long time now, but for
> some reason sometimes I get
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I see. The interesting part is that I asked about
> AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .html
> because httpd.conf has it enabled for us specifically. I Also tested by
> hand and confirmed that /www/subversion.apache.org/index2.html has SSI
> dire
Ben Reser writes:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> When the client sends the OPTIONS request to the proxy mod_dav calls
>> into mod_dav_svn/version.c:get_option. Is it possible for mod_dav_svn
>> to send an OPTIONS request to the master at that stage? I suppose
>> t
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Shivani Poddar
wrote:
> [ [ [
>
> Improving support for svn_checksum.h in SWIG bindings.
This isn't how I'd word this commit description. You haven't actually
improved support at all with this patch, but rather you've added tests
for a function that already works
Peelman, Nick wrote on Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 13:13:28 -0500:
> Adds a Date header and a Message-ID with the revision property embedded at
> the end.
Why is this necessary? Can you describe a setup in which Date or
Message-ID are not added? (I assume usually the MTA would add them if
they're miss
Adds a Date header and a Message-ID with the revision property embedded at the
end.
-nick
--
Peelman, Nick
n...@peelman.us
mailer.py.diff
Description: Binary data
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Ben Reser wrote on Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:22:13 -0800:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
> > When the client sends the OPTIONS request to the proxy mod_dav calls
> > into mod_dav_svn/version.c:get_option. Is it possible for mod_dav_svn
> > to send an OPTIONS request to th
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Roderich Schupp
wrote:
> I used swig 2.0.9, but the change happened from 2.0.4 to 2.0.5.
> A quick "git bisect" puts the blame on
> https://github.com/swig/swig/commit/30206f975c3c3fbd6e702499727375b4321b490e
> "Fix constructors in named typedef class declarations"
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> When the client sends the OPTIONS request to the proxy mod_dav calls
> into mod_dav_svn/version.c:get_option. Is it possible for mod_dav_svn
> to send an OPTIONS request to the master at that stage? I suppose
> that's a not quite the same a
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
> +1 - "svn diff" while running "svn commit" (blocking waiting for $EDITOR to
> exit) is my SOP as well. If we break that by default, I consider it a
> regression. -- justin
+1
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:50:27PM +0530, Chetna Gupta wrote:
> Hey People,
> I am completely new to open source development, but i seriously wana
> contribute towards OSD projects. Can someone please guide me, or mentor me
> while i take my first step towards Open source
Hi Chetna. This kind of
Hey People,
I am completely new to open source development, but i seriously wana
contribute towards OSD projects. Can someone please guide me, or mentor me
while i take my first step towards Open source
Thanks
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Abhishek Singh <
abhishekkumarsingh@gmail.com> wro
Mark Phippard writes:
> I guess it would be nice if mod_dav_svn could do this probing itself
> upon startup or something and then cache it. Obviously it cannot do
> it as part of the actual proxying as that would be too late.
When the client sends the OPTIONS request to the proxy mod_dav calls
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> We needed this information in Subversion Edge so that we could
>> configure a slave correctly. In our case, we only knew the master was
>> either running 1.6 or 1.7 so we just send the master an HTTP request
>> to figure out if it support
Mark Phippard wrote on Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:24:03 -0500:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Reviving an old thread: has anyone evaluated the possibility of having the
> > slave ask the master for its version at runtime?
>
> I have considered asking for that before, but
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Reviving an old thread: has anyone evaluated the possibility of having the
> slave ask the master for its version at runtime?
I have considered asking for that before, but I held off because if
this were possible wouldn't that be considered
Reviving an old thread: has anyone evaluated the possibility of having the
slave ask the master for its version at runtime?
Currently we require an "SVNMasterVersion 1.7" directive in the slave's
httpd.conf, but the problem is that the value of that directive can get out of
date as the master is u
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:57:13 +:
> On 20/01/13 05:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Gabriela Gibson wrote on Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 00:15:46 +:
>>> On 03/01/13 04:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> + Enable Server Side Includes for the relevant DocumentRoot. The
> +
(this is a test, I hope this does not make it's own, new thread!)
On 1/20/13, Gabriela Gibson wrote:
> On 20/01/13 05:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Gabriela Gibson wrote on Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 00:15:46 +:
>>> On 03/01/13 04:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> + Enable Server Side Includes for the
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:35:16 +:
> Sorry for the reply mess, I wish I could reply to my last post to the
> thread, but I can't -- as Brane informs me, Google is discarding my
> emails, so I have to see about another email account that isn't as
> 'helpful' :)
>
I
On 19.02.2013 13:35, Gabriela Gibson wrote:
> On 20/01/13 05:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Gabriela Gibson wrote on Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 00:15:46 +:
>>> On 03/01/13 04:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> + Enable Server Side Includes for the relevant DocumentRoot.
> The
> + relevant Ap
On 20/01/13 05:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 00:15:46 +:
On 03/01/13 04:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
+ Enable Server Side Includes for the relevant DocumentRoot. The
+ relevant Apache directive is:
+ Options +Include
What about:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: MARTIN PHILIP [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] On Behalf Of
>> Philip Martin
>> Sent: dinsdag 19 februari 2013 11:50
>> To: Bert Huijben
>> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1
> -Original Message-
> From: MARTIN PHILIP [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] On Behalf Of
> Philip Martin
> Sent: dinsdag 19 februari 2013 11:50
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1447487 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/svn.c
>
> "Bert Huijb
On 19.02.2013 11:49, Philip Martin wrote:
> Users that mix the command line with GUIs can switch off exclusive
> locking. If we switch the default then users that want performance
> need to switch on exclusive locking. I don't know which group is
> bigger, users who want performance or users who wa
"Bert Huijben" writes:
>> + This blocks every other application from accessing our wc.db at the
>> same
>> + time as this process. So instead of using the working copy lock
>> functions
>> + as designed other processes will already block before being able to
>> check
>> + that
Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 22:18:33 -0500:
> +1 - "svn diff" while running "svn commit" (blocking waiting for $EDITOR to
> exit) is my SOP as well. If we break that by default, I consider it a
> regression. -- justin
+1
On 2013-02-19 07:44, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Will this break any use-cases? (eg: do some people send commit mails to
> mailing lists configured to reject Precedence:bulk inbound mails?)
>
> Would it be better to allow the user to set arbitrary headers? Example
> UI for mailer.py.conf:
>
>[he
43 matches
Mail list logo
