On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Roderich Schupp <roderich.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > I used swig 2.0.9, but the change happened from 2.0.4 to 2.0.5. > A quick "git bisect" puts the blame on > https://github.com/swig/swig/commit/30206f975c3c3fbd6e702499727375b4321b490e > "Fix constructors in named typedef class declarations". > Probably an unintended side effect, though IMHO the behaviour in 2.0.9 is > correct.
Agreed I do think the newer behavior is better, nor is it a problem to support, so I'm not going to worry about it. Thanks for the patches and finding the exact change that caused the behavior change.
