Hi Stefan,
Thanks for your reply.
I used SVN for around 2 years in one of the organizations where I worked.
There I had moved from CVS to SVN and I really liked it. At present I am
contributing to one of the projects in Gnome and I am using Git there.
I didn't use svn diff with other diff tool.
'svn merge' appears to hang when running a simple merge:
[[[
$ svnd merge ^/subversion/trunk/
^Csubversion/svn/util.c:913: (apr_err=4)
subversion/svn/merge-cmd.c:163: (apr_err=4)
subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c:11856: (apr_err=4)
subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c:11829: (apr_err=4)
subversion/libs
[Eric S. Raymond]
> 1. Add support to the client tools for shipping a FULLNAME field
> mined from somewhere under ~/.subversion. Maybe the existing
> username entry will do, maybe it won't - I see arguments both ways.
> I don't care, we can fill in that detail later.
This part (upon which your
Julian Foad writes:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:52:15PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> [...]
>>> OWNERSHIP: Given Philip's comment, I believe it is reasonable to
>>> deem him the owner of this body of work, or at least co-owner with
>>> a possibly-time-constra
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:52:15PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
[...]
>> OWNERSHIP: Given Philip's comment, I believe it is reasonable to
>> deem him the owner of this body of work, or at least co-owner with
>> a possibly-time-constrained Stefan. But perhaps all t
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
I was wondering whether we could have one or two of
our UNIX build bots create a code coverage profile
and make the results available online.
[...]
>> I attach an updated patch. It uses '
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> Recently Johan proposed supporting multiple targets for svnlook
>> propget: http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-11/0439.shtml
>>
>> One of the ideas that came of this was to make the output o
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:07:14PM +0300, Judy Okite wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have bumped into this information, rather late and unfortunately cannot
> be able to send in an application, however I would request, if it is
> possible to be granted an opportunity to still work on this on a voluntary
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>>
>> Prompted by a question on users I wondered how SQLite's vacuum
>> (http://sqlite.org/lang_vacuum.html) would affect wc.db size. On a
>> Subversion trunk working copy I have been
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> Recently Johan proposed supporting multiple targets for svnlook
> propget: http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-11/0439.shtml
>
> One of the ideas that came of this was to make the output of 'svnlook
> (pl|pg)' mimic the output of 'svn (pl|pg)'.
Dear all,
I have bumped into this information, rather late and unfortunately cannot
be able to send in an application, however I would request, if it is
possible to be granted an opportunity to still work on this on a voluntary
basis, both as a learning and experience platform.
I have not worked
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:19:45PM -, julianf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: julianfoad
> Date: Mon Dec 3 16:19:44 2012
> New Revision: 1416578
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1416578&view=rev
> Log:
> A bit of table-driven goodness for the interactive conflict resolver.
Awesome, t
Bert Huijben wrote on Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 13:51:20 +0100:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: rhuij...@apache.org [mailto:rhuij...@apache.org]
> > Sent: maandag 3 december 2012 13:46
> > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: svn commit: r1416494 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
>
We've got several fairly important changes already merged onto the
1.7.x branch. Please vote for any additional changes you'd like to
see included in 1.7.8 this week.
I'm planning to roll tarballs on December 10th which is one week from
today. With the expected release date to be December 17th.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Maybe it is time to release a Subversion 1.7.8 with this fix in?
> (Or even a 1.7.8 with just this fix)
I was going to try to get 1.7.8 started last week but just didn't get to it.
I'll send an email to get 1.7.8 started now.
> -Original Message-
> From: rhuij...@apache.org [mailto:rhuij...@apache.org]
> Sent: maandag 3 december 2012 13:46
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1416494 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
>
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Mon Dec 3 12:46:08 2012
> New Revision:
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Prompted by a question on users I wondered how SQLite's vacuum
> (http://sqlite.org/lang_vacuum.html) would affect wc.db size. On a
> Subversion trunk working copy I have been using for months the size was
> reduced from 2.3MB to 1.3MB which
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Prompted by a question on users I wondered how SQLite's vacuum
> (http://sqlite.org/lang_vacuum.html) would affect wc.db size. On a
> Subversion trunk working copy I have been using for months the size was
> reduced from 2.3MB to 1.3MB which
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:51 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Perhaps this should be discussed on the serf dev list? Or an issue filed
> in
> their tracker?
>
Since I apprently can't post on serf-dev, I opened an issue for 1.8:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4266
-- Stefan^2.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [stef...@apache.org]
> > * subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/util.h
> > (RECOVERABLE_RETRY_COUNT,
> [...]
> >move_into_place): lib-locally declare functions previously
> >private in fs_fs.c
>
> This is a problem - on many OSes[*], al
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
> > Sent: maandag 3 december 2012 07:48
> > To: us...@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: 1.7.7 svn client x64 crashes while committing with
> crede
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> >> I was wondering whether we could have one or two of
> >> our UNIX build bots create a code coverage profile
> >> and make the results available online.
>
Prompted by a question on users I wondered how SQLite's vacuum
(http://sqlite.org/lang_vacuum.html) would affect wc.db size. On a
Subversion trunk working copy I have been using for months the size was
reduced from 2.3MB to 1.3MB which isn't really a significant change.
For a further test I check
Ben Reser writes:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>> As for the looping, didn't we put in logic to stop retrying after a number
>> of request failures? That's probably a reasonable thing to do...I
>> definitely think a very nice feature of serf is that it *will* re
> -Original Message-
> From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
> Sent: maandag 3 december 2012 07:48
> To: us...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 1.7.7 svn client x64 crashes while committing with
credentials
> provided on the command line.
>
> Guten Tag Mikhail Pereia
Hi,
Just another crazy idea:
The main problem with the parallelization in ra_serf seems to be the number of
http requests (which potentially causes a high number of authentications and
tcp connections).
Maybe we could add some partitioned send-all request:
When the client decides to use 4 con
Hi, Brane,
Von: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 1. Dezember 2012 15:24
> An: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: reposurgeon now writes Subversion repositories
[...]
> P.S.: I find it fascinating that DVCS aficionados haven't noticed that
> GitHub takes the D ou
27 matches
Mail list logo
