On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Julian Foad <julianf...@btopenworld.com>wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > >> I was wondering whether we could have one or two of > >> our UNIX build bots create a code coverage profile > >> and make the results available online. > >> > >> Here is what I use in my test runner script: > >> > >> [[[ > >> env CFLAGS='-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage' ./configure > --disable-shared --enable-maintainer-mode $moreopts > >> > >> make -sj 2> /dev/null > /dev/null > >> make svnserveautocheck PARALLEL=1 > >> > >> lcov -d . -b . -c -o tests.lcov > lcov.log > >> genhtml tests.lcov -o html > genhtml.log > >> ]]] > > > > > > +1 to test coverage stats. > > > > > > We have an ancient patch [...] in tools/dev/gcov.patch. [...] > > I attach an updated patch. It uses 'lcov' instead of 'gcov' as Stefan > suggests, which makes the Makefile target much simpler; and I modeled the > 'configure' handling on the existing --enable-gprof switch. > Looks good. > The existing --enable-gprof option requires --disable-shared and > recommends --enable-all-static, and I have just copied that without > understanding why or whether the same applies to gcov. > Given the bindings problem you ran into with an all-static build, I wonder whether it should rather be the other way around. I'll probably commit it soon if there are no objections, even though my > testing has been rather limited, as it seems unlikely to cause problems for > anyone except those who use it. > Since this is a developers only option, it is sufficient if we know about at least one working configuration. -- Stefan^2. -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: * http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download *
