On Tuesday 13 November 2012 06:45 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: vijay [mailto:vi...@collab.net]
Sent: dinsdag 13 november 2012 14:06
To: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement '--include-externals' option to 'svn list'
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 03:0
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2012 1:44 AM, "Lieven Govaerts" wrote:
>>...
>
>
>> Implemented in serf r1692, with an API for applications to enable SSL
>> compression. Which to be clear, I don't propose svn to use.
>
> This API would go into a 1.2 and 2.0, but
On Nov 14, 2012 1:44 AM, "Lieven Govaerts" wrote:
>...
> Implemented in serf r1692, with an API for applications to enable SSL
> compression. Which to be clear, I don't propose svn to use.
This API would go into a 1.2 and 2.0, but if nobody is asking for it, then
I'd suggest we don't spin those u
On 14 nov 2012, at 11:53, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>>
>>> Confirmed as far as my testing goes (did not test short_circuit). I suggest
>>> committing the patch with GET subrequest and potentially change all to
>>> HEAD in a separate commit if there is consensus.
>> Committed in r1408184.
> I doubt abo
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
>...
> Having hooks run in a separate process is complicated. The process
> would need to be multi-threaded, or multi-process, to avoid hooks
> running in serial. stdin/out/err would need to be handled
> somehow. Pipes perhaps? By passing fi
"Bert Huijben" writes:
>>err = svn_client_propget5(&props, &inherited_config_auto_props,
>> SVN_PROP_INHERITABLE_AUTO_PROPS,
>> path_or_url,
>> &rev, &rev, NULL, svn_depth_empty, NULL,
>> ctx,
>> -
> -Original Message-
> From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
> Sent: woensdag 14 november 2012 13:47
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1409186 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/add.c
>
> Author: philip
> Date: Wed Nov 14 12:46:40 2012
>
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps we could start up a separate hook script process before
>> allocating the large FSFS cache and then delegate the fork/exec to that
>> smaller process?
>>
>
> I wonder whether there is a way to pass a different
> cache setting to the sub-process.
I d
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Thomas Åkesson
> wrote:
>>
>> On 9 nov 2012, at 18:45, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Thomas Åkesson
>>> wrote:
Parentpath on /svn/ and Satisfy Any:
- Access with
9 matches
Mail list logo
