On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Lieven G
Hi Johan,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
Hi Johan,
as you seem to be t
Here we go again :)
After some more testing, I have found another problem with the
svn-status mode in psvn.el. The attached patches extend on the previous
one to also make ediff-mode work again with psvn.el.
Andre Colomb wrote on 2012-08-17 19:25
> The current HEAD version of the Emacs SVN statu
Hello again!
It appears that the contributed Emacs Subversion management mode psvn.el
does not handle file EOL encodings well when retrieving old file
revisions from the repository. The attached patch tries to fix some
problems in this code.
Suppose you have a file foo in a repository which conta
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:13:26 -0400:
> On 08/27/2012 08:45 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > cmpil...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 17:02:25 -:
> >> Author: cmpilato
> >> Date: Fri Aug 24 17:02:24 2012
> >> New Revision: 1376992
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.
Hi,
Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@apache.org]
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 05:21:09PM -0400, Paul Burba wrote:
> > Currently trunk tries to auto-upgrade the WC pretty much every chance
> > it gets, even when the cwd is an unversioned directory within a WC.
> > I've been wondering if this is reall
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Makes sense. Except that I'd argue against having an auto-upgrade
> option. It seems to me that it would just complicate bug reporting
> without actually gaining anyone anything. If you're thinking about
> large-scale client deployments in co
On 08/27/2012 08:45 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> cmpil...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 17:02:25 -:
>> Author: cmpilato
>> Date: Fri Aug 24 17:02:24 2012
>> New Revision: 1376992
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1376992&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * subversion/libsvn_repos/repos.c
>
In my experience (I work in finance/banking sector), the issue with WC
upgrades tend to come from reliance on multiple tools:
cmd line - for scripts
IDE plugin - for development
plugin for the file explorer - for task that are quicker done outside IDE
Continuous Integration plugin
in "enterprise"
cmpil...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 17:02:25 -:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Fri Aug 24 17:02:24 2012
> New Revision: 1376992
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1376992&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_repos/repos.c
> (create_hooks): Tweak 'start-commit' template text
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>>> Hi Johan,
>>>
>>>
>>> as you seem to be the only one encountering issue 4174, would you mind
>>> testing attached ser
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:04:09AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> This is tending off-topic, but I'll note that this is in a class of
> server-side configuration that would not (in fact, *should not* in my
> opinion) be aided by the work that Paul is doing right now. Configuration
> via inherit
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I'm thinking that we ought to continue auto-upgrade for the masses,
> especially given Bert's input. Much as I dislike config knobs, it seems
> prudent to introduce a "disable auto-upgrade" option for large, multi-client
> shops. IMO, you're te
On 08/27/2012 07:56 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:47:58AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
>> I'm thinking that we ought to continue auto-upgrade for the masses,
>> especially given Bert's input. Much as I dislike config knobs, it seems
>> prudent to introduce a "disable auto-upgr
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:47:58AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> I'm thinking that we ought to continue auto-upgrade for the masses,
> especially given Bert's input. Much as I dislike config knobs, it seems
> prudent to introduce a "disable auto-upgrade" option for large,
> multi-client shops. IMO, yo
Bert Huijben wrote on Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:09:07 +0200:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: maandag 27 augustus 2012 00:39
> > To: Subversion Development
> > Subject: notification output bottleneck
> >
> > I've never noticed this before
I'm thinking that we ought to continue auto-upgrade for the masses,
especially given Bert's input. Much as I dislike config knobs, it seems
prudent to introduce a "disable auto-upgrade" option for large,
multi-client shops. IMO, you're tending towards sophisticated if you use
more than one svn clie
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: maandag 27 augustus 2012 00:39
>> To: Subversion Development
>> Subject: notification output bottleneck
>>
>> I've never noticed this before (slow server,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
>> Sent: zondag 26 augustus 2012 21:39
>> To: Greg Stein
>> Cc: Branko Čibej; dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Auto Upgrade Behavior
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 26,
19 matches
Mail list logo
