On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Joe Swatosh writes:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Philip Martin
>> wrote:
>>> Joe Swatosh writes:
>>>
>>> I don't understand why prop_mod is no longer being set.
>>
>> Because replay is no longer setting it?
>
> Does that mean the
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote on Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:18:18 +0200:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> > Forwarding to maintainers
>
> Am I considered a maintainer of psvn.el because COMMITTERS
> lists me as a dormant partial committer for that?
> It might be clearest to just delete that line and the
>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 19:18, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
>> Forwarding to maintainers
>
> Am I considered a maintainer of psvn.el because COMMITTERS
> lists me as a dormant partial committer for that?
Nah... I bet Daniel just gathered names from 'svn log psvn.el', an
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Forwarding to maintainers
Am I considered a maintainer of psvn.el because COMMITTERS
lists me as a dormant partial committer for that?
It might be clearest to just delete that line and the
corresponding access-control entry, as I really do not
expect to make any changes t
pbu...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:48:34 -:
> +/* Helper for svn_ra_get_file2 and svn_ra_get_dir3 when those APIs need to
> + find PATH's inherited properties on a legacy server that doesn't have the
> + SVN_RA_CAPABILITY_INHERITED_PROPS capability.
> +
> + All arguments a
julianf...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 17:15:23 -:
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/include/private/svn_client_private.h
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/include/private/svn_client_private.h?rev=1303016&r1=1303015&r2=1303016&view=diff
>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 17:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> gst...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 22:04:37 -:
>> +svn_ra_serf__copy_into_spillbuf(svn_spillbuf_t **spillbuf,
>> + serf_bucket_t *bkt,
>> + apr_pool_t *result_pool,
Forwarding to maintainers
sq@ -- consider submitting a patch:
http://subversion.apache.org/patches
s...@tigris.org wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:56:12 -0700:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4149
> Issue #|4149
> Summary|psvn.el: ediff bro
gst...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 22:04:37 -:
> +svn_ra_serf__copy_into_spillbuf(svn_spillbuf_t **spillbuf,
> +serf_bucket_t *bkt,
> +apr_pool_t *result_pool,
> +apr_pool_t *scratch_poo
On 21.03.2012 22:08, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:51:47 -0400:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Ashod Nakashian wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:19:02 -0700:
All,
I'm happy to share[1] with you the design document for t
Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:51:47 -0400:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Ashod Nakashian wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:19:02 -0700:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> I'm happy to share[1] with you the design document for the Compressed
> >> Pristines feature. The do
gst...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 17:52:36 -:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Mon Mar 19 17:52:36 2012
> New Revision: 1302571
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1302571&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/replay.c:
> (svn_ra_serf__reply_range): add commentary
>
> Mo
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Ashod Nakashian wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:19:02 -0700:
>> All,
>>
>> I'm happy to share[1] with you the design document for the Compressed
>> Pristines feature. The document is public and anyone can comment on any part
>
> I can't. Can
Ashod Nakashian wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:19:02 -0700:
> All,
>
> I'm happy to share[1] with you the design document for the Compressed
> Pristines feature. The document is public and anyone can comment on any part
I can't. Can you please move the document to our wiki, or dump it in an
e
All,
I'm happy to share[1] with you the design document for the Compressed Pristines
feature. The document is public and anyone can comment on any part (select,
right-click and comment away). If you'd like to get *editing* permission,
please email me and I'll add you to the list of editors.
I'
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 16:57 +, Philip Martin wrote:
> Or you could rebuild the current APR with a
> one-line patch to set ht->seed to 0 in apr_hash.c:apr_hash_make.
I think when subversion receive the result of this apr_function , we
should do the sort , ie , subversion should not depend on s
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 16:57 +, Philip Martin wrote:
> Sérgio Basto writes:
>
> > Unfortunately I don't had time before end of the month or even more ,
> > This random thing does not came in a good time .
> > I use many svn diff to review my code ...
> >
> > So any ideas is appreciated.
>
On 21.03.2012 18:03, Julian Foad wrote:
> Discussion of the details of APR's hash function has wandered off-topic for
> this thread. Can we take that to a new thread and/or the APR dev list?
>
Yes yes, but I have to get a last word in ... it's your standard
multiplicative hash straight out of Kn
Discussion of the details of APR's hash function has wandered off-topic for
this thread. Can we take that to a new thread and/or the APR dev list?
- Julian
Sérgio Basto writes:
> Unfortunately I don't had time before end of the month or even more ,
> This random thing does not came in a good time .
> I use many svn diff to review my code ...
>
> So any ideas is appreciated.
You can get the old behaviour by downgrading APR to a version that does
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 10:17 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 07:25:05 +:
> > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 08:00 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 03:02:53AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 00:51 +, Philip
Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 17:13:07 +0100:
> On 21.03.2012 15:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 13:00:01 +:
> >> Philip Martin writes:
> >>
> >>> So if I have
> >>>
> >>>0, 1 ... X, Y ... N-1
> >>>
> >>> where X and Y collide I would e
Philip Martin writes:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> I'm not aware of a deliberate change to core Subversion behaviour.
>> Property deletes should still be reported as property mods by the
>> Subversion libraries.
>
> Ah! There is a non-Ruby bug. Repository with property delete:
>
> svnadmin crea
On 21.03.2012 15:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 13:00:01 +:
>> Philip Martin writes:
>>
>>> So if I have
>>>
>>>0, 1 ... X, Y ... N-1
>>>
>>> where X and Y collide I would expect changing the seed to give:
>>>
>>>K, K+1 ... X, Y ... N-1, 0 ... K-
Philip Martin writes:
> I'm not aware of a deliberate change to core Subversion behaviour.
> Property deletes should still be reported as property mods by the
> Subversion libraries.
Ah! There is a non-Ruby bug. Repository with property delete:
svnadmin create repo
svn -mm import repo/format f
This dance you're doing is exactly why I disrecommend using *-imports. It
hands power/infection of your local namespace to a module not under your
control.
Cheers,
-g
On Mar 21, 2012 8:55 AM, wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Wed Mar 21 12:54:49 2012
> New Revision: 1303375
>
> URL: http://svn.a
Joe Swatosh writes:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Joe Swatosh writes:
>>
>> I don't understand why prop_mod is no longer being set.
>
> Because replay is no longer setting it?
Does that mean the core Subversion libraries have changed? I don't do
Ruby but it prop
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Joe Swatosh writes:
>
>> Before r1293375, the node that represented 'diff1.txt' in this walk
>> had the "prop_mod" member set true. After r1293375, the "prop_mod"
>> member for this node is false. Since the implementation of
>> Svn::Info#get
Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 13:00:01 +:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
> > So if I have
> >
> >0, 1 ... X, Y ... N-1
> >
> > where X and Y collide I would expect changing the seed to give:
> >
> >K, K+1 ... X, Y ... N-1, 0 ... K-1
> >
> > Is that going to remove the collisi
Philip Martin writes:
> So if I have
>
>0, 1 ... X, Y ... N-1
>
> where X and Y collide I would expect changing the seed to give:
>
>K, K+1 ... X, Y ... N-1, 0 ... K-1
>
> Is that going to remove the collision?
Is it something to do with the bins?. If X and Y were originally in the
same
Branko Čibej writes:
> On 21.03.2012 10:29, Philip Martin wrote:
>> In passing I note that the way APR "randomises" the hash is not all
>> that random. It just adds a fixed prefix to the keys passed to the
>> default hash function. I thought the point of the APR change was to
>> make it harder fo
On 21.03.2012 10:29, Philip Martin wrote:
> In passing I note that the way APR "randomises" the hash is not all
> that random. It just adds a fixed prefix to the keys passed to the
> default hash function. I thought the point of the APR change was to
> make it harder for the user to predict hash co
Joe Swatosh writes:
> Before r1293375, the node that represented 'diff1.txt' in this walk
> had the "prop_mod" member set true. After r1293375, the "prop_mod"
> member for this node is false. Since the implementation of
> Svn::Info#get_diff_recurse checks "prop_mod" member before attempting
> to
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Sérgio Basto wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 07:25:05 +:
>> Hi, Dev list , I want to fix random sort of svn status and svn diff, on
>> recent code of svn, it just put a sort somewhere, could someone point me
>> the directory in the source code, where is the code of svn f
Sérgio Basto wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 07:25:05 +:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 08:00 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 03:02:53AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 00:51 +, Philip Martin wrote:
> > > > Sérgio Basto writes:
> > > > > why the ou
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 07:25 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi, Dev list , I want to fix random sort of svn status and svn diff, on
> recent code of svn, it just put a sort somewhere, could someone point me
> the directory in the source code, where is the code of svn frontend
> commands like diff and
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 08:00 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 03:02:53AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 00:51 +, Philip Martin wrote:
> > > Sérgio Basto writes:
> > > > why the output shouldn't be sorted by name or something else ?
> > > > or why
37 matches
Mail list logo
