2011/11/10 Hyrum K Wright :
> Somebody approached me a few minutes ago at ApacheCon and posed the
> following question:
> "The username on my local box is different than my username on the server,
> and I don't want to cache passwords. How can I cache just the username?"
> It turns out I didn't h
Somebody approached me a few minutes ago at ApacheCon and posed the
following question:
"The username on my local box is different than my username on the server,
and I don't want to cache passwords. How can I cache just the username?"
It turns out I didn't have a good answer for him, aside from
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Daniel Näslund writes:
>> What is not clear to me is why skipped targets get added to targets_info
>> in the first place. How about moving the APR_ARRAY_PUSH inside the
>> !target
On 11/09/2011 02:02 PM, Stefano Crosta wrote:
> due to the issue listed here:
> http://groups.google.com/group/subversion-development/browse_thread/thread/c9e9d8ad7d4e8a1/df2db8056c4d957f
> I need to go back to SVN 1.6
>
> Is there any way to revert the upgrade or do I have to re-checkout all
> of
due to the issue listed here:
http://groups.google.com/group/subversion-development/browse_thread/thread/c9e9d8ad7d4e8a1/df2db8056c4d957f
I need to go back to SVN 1.6
Is there any way to revert the upgrade or do I have to re-checkout all
of my repositories on the client?
thanks
Stefan Sperling writes:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:18:20PM +, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Daniel Näslund writes:
>>
>> > A side note; when I tested the patch I needed to use abspath's in the
>> > patch file or else the target wouldn't get skipped.
>>
>> When raising the issue I had difficult
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:54:32PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 18:41:34 +0100:
> > Patch targets get skipped in any of these circumstances:
> >
> > - the target is the working copy root
>
> Can a patch represent a propchange on the wc root?
Yes, t
Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 18:41:34 +0100:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:18:20PM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> > Daniel Näslund writes:
> >
> > > A side note; when I tested the patch I needed to use abspath's in the
> > > patch file or else the target wouldn't get skipped.
> >
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:18:20PM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> Daniel Näslund writes:
>
> > A side note; when I tested the patch I needed to use abspath's in the
> > patch file or else the target wouldn't get skipped.
>
> When raising the issue I had difficulty producing the test case because
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Another idea: We could provide some way to mark a revision
> as merged without requiring a working copy. I.e. somehow propedit
> the svn:mergeinfo value on the branch as appropriate. [...]
Thanks Stefan. I added this to the list in the Wiki.
Email is fine; also feel free
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:32:20PM -, Apache Wiki wrote:
> The "KeepingReintegratedBranchAlive" page has been changed by JulianFoad:
> http://wiki.apache.org/subversion/KeepingReintegratedBranchAlive?action=diff&rev1=1&rev2=2
>
>
> Ways to make it easier:
>
> - * Make it easier for th
Daniel Näslund writes:
> A side note; when I tested the patch I needed to use abspath's in the
> patch file or else the target wouldn't get skipped.
When raising the issue I had difficulty producing the test case because
I couldn't work out quite what caused a path to get skipped. I guess
Windo
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Daniel Näslund writes:
>
>> Index: subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c
>> ===
>> --- subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c (revision 1199347)
>> +++ subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c (
Daniel Näslund writes:
> Index: subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c
> ===
> --- subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c (revision 1199347)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c (arbetskopia)
> @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ typedef struct patch_target
14 matches
Mail list logo
