HI Sandy,
Just curious if the Vote is for rc5 or rc6? Gmail shows me that you
replied to the rc5 thread.
Thanks,
- Henry
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Sandy Ryza wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * Built the release from source.
> * Compiled Java and Scala apps that interact with HDFS against i
I'll start the voting with a +1.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 1.0.0!
>
> This patch has minor documentation changes and fixes on top of rc6.
>
> The tag to be voted on is v1.0.0-rc7 (commit 92
Apache has been having some problems lately. Do you guys see this message?
I submitted a PR for standardizing the text format for vectors and
labeled data: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/685
Once it gets merged, saveAsTextFile and loading should be consistent.
I didn't choose LibSVM as the default format because two reasons:
1) It doesn't contain feature dimension
This vote is cancelled in favor of rc7.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 1.0.0!
>
> This patch has a few minor fixes on top of rc5. I've also built the
> binary artifacts with Hive support enabled
Yes.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Andrew Or wrote:
> Apache has been having some problems lately. Do you guys see this message?
>
Yes.
On May 16, 2014 8:39 AM, "Andrew Or" wrote:
> Apache has been having some problems lately. Do you guys see this message?
>
Hi Patrick,
Just want to make sure that VOTE for rc6 also cancelled?
Thanks,
Henry
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> I'll start the voting with a +1.
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apa
Yes.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:40 AM, DB Tsai wrote:
> Yes.
> On May 16, 2014 8:39 AM, "Andrew Or" wrote:
>
> > Apache has been having some problems lately. Do you guys see this
> message?
> >
>
On the webpage http://spark.apache.org/examples.html, there is an example
written as
val count = spark.parallelize(1 to NUM_SAMPLES).map(i =>
val x = Math.random()
val y = Math.random()
if (x*x + y*y < 1) 1 else 0
).reduce(_ + _)
println("Pi is roughly " + 4.0 * count / NUM_SAMPLES)
This do
It was, but due to the apache infra issues, some may not have received the
email yet...
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Just want to make sure that VOTE for rc6 also cancelled?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Henry
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Patrick Wendell
>
Hey Everyone,
Just a heads up - I've sent other release candidates to the list, but
they appear to be getting swallowed (i.e. they are not on nabble). I
think there is an issue with Apache mail servers.
I'm going to keep trying... if you get duplicate e-mails I apologize in advance.
On Thu, May
I didn't see the original message, but only a reply.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Nishkam Ravi wrote:
> Yes.
>
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:40 AM, DB Tsai wrote:
>
> > Yes.
> > On May 16, 2014 8:39 AM, "Andrew Or" wrote:
> >
> > > Apache has been having some problems lately. Do you guys
Thanks for pointing it out. We should update the website to fix the code.
val count = spark.parallelize(1 to NUM_SAMPLES).map { i =>
val x = Math.random()
val y = Math.random()
if (x*x + y*y < 1) 1 else 0
}.reduce(_ + _)
println("Pi is roughly " + 4.0 * count / NUM_SAMPLES)
On Fri, May 16
Actually, the better way to write the multi-line closure would be:
val count = spark.parallelize(1 to NUM_SAMPLES).map { _ =>
val x = Math.random()
val y = Math.random()
if (x*x + y*y < 1) 1 else 0
}.reduce(_ + _)
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:41 AM, GlennStrycker wrote:
> On the webpage http
I am attempting to write a mapreduce job on a graph object to take an edge
list and return a new edge list. Unfortunately I find that the current
function is
def reduce(f: (T, T) => T): T
not
def reduce(f: (T1, T2) => T3): T
I see this because the following 2 commands give different results f
Sorry, looks like an extra line got inserted in there. One more try:
val count = spark.parallelize(1 to NUM_SAMPLES).map { _ =>
val x = Math.random()
val y = Math.random()
if (x*x + y*y < 1) 1 else 0
}.reduce(_ + _)
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Mark Hamstra wrote:
> Actually, the b
Why does the reduce function only work on sums of keys of the same type and
does not support other functional forms?
I am having trouble in another example where instead of 1s and 0s, the
output of the map function is something like A=(1,2) and B=(3,4). I need a
reduce function that can return so
[Due to ASF e-mail outage, I'm not if anyone will actually receive this.]
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 1.0.0!
This has only minor changes on top of rc7.
The tag to be voted on is v1.0.0-rc8 (commit 80eea0f):
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=spa
Sorry for the duplication, but I think this is the current VOTE candidate
-- we're not voting on rc8 yet?
+1, but just barely. We've got quite a number of outstanding bugs
identified, and many of them have fixes in progress. I'd hate to see those
efforts get lost in a post-1.0.0 flood of new fea
Finally find a way out of the ClassLoader maze! It took me some times to
understand how it works; I think it worths to document it in a separated
thread.
We're trying to add external utility.jar which contains CSVRecordParser,
and we added the jar to executors through sc.addJar APIs.
If the insta
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 1.0.0!
This patch has minor documentation changes and fixes on top of rc6.
The tag to be voted on is v1.0.0-rc7 (commit 9212b3e):
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=spark.git;a=commit;h=9212b3e5bb5545ccfce242da8d89108
+1, but just barely. We've got quite a number of outstanding bugs
identified, and many of them have fixes in progress. I'd hate to see those
efforts get lost in a post-1.0.0 flood of new features targeted at 1.1.0 --
in other words, I'd like to see 1.0.1 retain a high priority relative to
1.1.0.
Thanks for your feedback. Since it's not a regression, it won't block
the release.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:17 AM, witgo wrote:
> SPARK-1817 will cause users to get incorrect results and RDD.zip is common
> usage .
> This should be the highest priority. I think we should fix the bug,and shoul
Yes, rc5 and rc6 were cancelled. There is now an rc7. Unfortunately the
Apache mailing list issue has caused lots of emails not to come through.
Here is the details (hopefully it goes through):
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 1.0.0!
This patch has mino
Hey all,
My vote threads seem to be running about 24 hours behind and/or
getting swallowed by infra e-mail.
I sent RC8 yesterday and we might send one tonight as well. I'll make
sure to close all existing ones
There have been only small "polish" changes in the recent RC's since
RC5. So testing a
3) It is not designed for dense feature vectors.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Xiangrui Meng wrote:
> I submitted a PR for standardizing the text format for vectors and
> labeled data: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/685
>
> Once it gets merged, saveAsTextFile and loading should be consis
+1
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> [Due to ASF e-mail outage, I'm not if anyone will actually receive this.]
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 1.0.0!
> This has only minor changes on top of rc7.
>
> The tag to be voted on is
Effectively this is persist without fault tolerance.
Failure of any node means complete lack of fault tolerance.
I would be very skeptical of truncating lineage if it is not reliable.
On 17-May-2014 3:49 am, "Xiangrui Meng (JIRA)" wrote:
> Xiangrui Meng created SPARK-1855:
>
Ah ok, thanks Aaron
Just to make sure we VOTE the right RC.
Thanks,
Henry
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Aaron Davidson wrote:
> It was, but due to the apache infra issues, some may not have received the
> email yet...
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi P
So was rc5 cancelled ? Did not see a note indicating that or why ... [1]
- Mridul
[1] could have easily missed it in the email storm though !
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 1.0.0!
>
> This pa
-1
We found a regression in the way configuration is passed to executors.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1864
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/808
Michael
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Mark Hamstra wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Patrick Wendell
> wrote
No. Only 3 of the responses.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Nishkam Ravi wrote:
> Yes.
>
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:40 AM, DB Tsai wrote:
>
> > Yes.
> > On May 16, 2014 8:39 AM, "Andrew Or" wrote:
> >
> > > Apache has been having some problems lately. Do you guys see this
> > message?
>
With 3x replication, we should be able to achieve fault tolerance.
This checkPointed RDD can be cleared if we have another in-memory
checkPointed RDD down the line. It can avoid hitting disk if we have
enough memory to use. We need to investigate more to find a good
solution. -Xiangrui
On Fri, May
35 matches
Mail list logo
