Thanks for your feedback. Since it's not a regression, it won't block the release.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:17 AM, witgo <wi...@qq.com> wrote: > SPARK-1817 will cause users to get incorrect results and RDD.zip is common > usage . > This should be the highest priority. I think we should fix the bug,and should > also test the previous release > ------------------ Original ------------------ > From: "Patrick Wendell";<pwend...@gmail.com>; > Date: Wed, May 14, 2014 03:02 PM > To: "dev@spark.apache.org"<dev@spark.apache.org>; > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.0.0 (rc5) > > > > Hey @witgo - those bugs are not severe enough to block the release, > but it would be nice to get them fixed. > > At this point we are focused on severe bugs with an immediate fix, or > regressions from previous versions of Spark. Anything that misses this > release will get merged into the branch-1.0 branch and make it into > the 1.0.1 release, so people will have access to it. > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:32 PM, witgo <wi...@qq.com> wrote: >> -1 >> The following bug should be fixed: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1817 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1712 >> >> >> ------------------ Original ------------------ >> From: "Patrick Wendell";<pwend...@gmail.com>; >> Date: Wed, May 14, 2014 04:07 AM >> To: "dev@spark.apache.org"<dev@spark.apache.org>; >> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.0.0 (rc5) >> >> >> >> Hey all - there were some earlier RC's that were not presented to the >> dev list because issues were found with them. Also, there seems to be >> some issues with the reliability of the dev list e-mail. Just a heads >> up. >> >> I'll lead with a +1 for this. >> >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Nan Zhu <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> just curious, where is rc4 VOTE? >>> >>> I searched my gmail but didn't find that? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-1.0.0-rc5/ >>>> >>>> Good news is that the sigs, MD5 and SHA are all correct. >>>> >>>> Tiny note: the Maven artifacts use SHA1, while the binary artifacts >>>> use SHA512, which took me a bit of head-scratching to figure out. >>>> >>>> If another RC comes out, I might suggest making it SHA1 everywhere? >>>> But there is nothing wrong with these signatures and checksums. >>>> >>>> Now to look at the contents... >>>> >> . > .
