Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43#issuecomment-36327170
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12929/
---
If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43#issuecomment-36327168
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38#issuecomment-36326993
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38#issuecomment-36326995
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12928/
---
If your project i
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43#discussion_r10156359
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskStore.scala ---
@@ -84,12 +84,27 @@ private class DiskStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
diskManager:
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43#discussion_r10156343
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockFetcherIterator.scala ---
@@ -146,6 +146,12 @@ object BlockFetcherIterator {
}
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43#discussion_r10156309
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockFetcherIterator.scala ---
@@ -146,6 +146,12 @@ object BlockFetcherIterator {
}
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43#discussion_r10156300
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockFetcherIterator.scala ---
@@ -146,6 +146,12 @@ object BlockFetcherIterator {
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43#issuecomment-36326084
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43#issuecomment-36326074
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43#issuecomment-36326073
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user pwendell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43
SPARK-1145: Memory mapping with many small blocks can cause JVM allocation
failures
This includes some minor code clean-up as well. The main change is that
small files are not memory mapped. There i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38#issuecomment-36325879
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38#issuecomment-36325871
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38#issuecomment-36325872
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38#issuecomment-36325759
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36325079
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12927/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36325078
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36324015
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36323971
thanks I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36324006
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36324005
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36323841
Thanks @pwendell -- fixed the style!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#discussion_r10155351
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockFetcherIterator.scala ---
@@ -233,7 +238,16 @@ object BlockFetcherIterator {
logDeb
Hi Folks,
I just filed https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-1149 - I'm
happy to fix it, but I'd like input about how best to go about it. The
problem is, if a partitioner misbehaves by, say, returning a negative
partition number, Spark hangs. This is easier to do than it sounds.
I'd l
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38#issuecomment-36322600
Jenkins, this is okay to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12#issuecomment-36321849
this is a re-opened PR, in the old PR,
https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pull/636, all test cases have passed
Can anyone verify that and make further revi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#issuecomment-36315930
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12926/
---
If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#issuecomment-36315929
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#discussion_r10152493
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockFetcherIterator.scala ---
@@ -233,7 +238,16 @@ object BlockFetcherIterator {
logDebug("G
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#discussion_r10152243
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockFetcherIterator.scala ---
@@ -44,9 +44,14 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
*/
You can make the patch so that everyone review
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Nan Zhu wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I just created a JIRA https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-1139 .
> The issue discusses that:
>
> the new Hadoop API based Spark APIs are actually a mixture
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#issuecomment-36315155
Hey Tom,
This patch is looking really great. I took a pretty thorough look through
this and there were really only two high level things:
1. Configuration
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10152124
--- Diff: docs/security.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Spark Security
+---
+
+Spark currently supports authenticat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#issuecomment-36314544
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#issuecomment-36314537
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#issuecomment-36314536
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10151846
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/SecurityMessage.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#issuecomment-36313840
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12925/
---
If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#issuecomment-36313839
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10151554
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -41,56 +46,103 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
type Respo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#issuecomment-36313780
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#issuecomment-36313766
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42#issuecomment-36313763
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42
[WIP] [SPARK-1132] Persisting Web UI through refactoring the SparkListener
interface
The fleeting nature of the Spark Web UI has long been a problem reported by
many users: The existing Web UI dis
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29#issuecomment-36313360
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29#issuecomment-36313361
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12924/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29#issuecomment-36311620
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29#issuecomment-36311619
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29#issuecomment-36311628
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29#issuecomment-36311392
Oops, actually pushed it this time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10150334
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -41,56 +46,103 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
type Respo
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10150320
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -41,56 +46,103 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
type Respo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41#issuecomment-36308968
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41#issuecomment-36308969
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12923/
---
If your project i
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10149280
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/ConnectionManager.scala ---
@@ -557,7 +754,54 @@ private[spark] class ConnectionManager(port: Int,
conf
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10149145
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/ConnectionId.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36307824
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12922/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36307822
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41#issuecomment-36306883
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41#issuecomment-36306872
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41#issuecomment-36306871
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user ngbinh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41
Update io.netty from 4.0.13 Final to 4.0.17.Final
This update contains a lot of bug fixes and some new perf improvements.
It is also binary compatible with the current 4.0.13.Final
For more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36306198
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
GitHub user dbtsai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40
Initialized the regVal for first iteration in SGD optimizer
Ported from https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pull/633
In runMiniBatchSGD, the regVal (for 1st iter) should be initialized
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40#issuecomment-36306177
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36305801
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36305816
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39#issuecomment-36305800
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user kayousterhout opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/39
Remote BlockFetchTracker trait
This trait seems to have been created a while ago when there
were multiple implementations; now that there's just one, I think it
makes sense to merge it in
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37#issuecomment-36303359
Merged into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38#issuecomment-36301198
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38#issuecomment-36301181
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
GitHub user dianacarroll opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38
SPARK-1134
bug with ipython: startup scripts are called in both interactive and
non-interactive mode. This prevents non-interactive use with spark because the
spark startup script and user sc
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10144869
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -477,6 +505,21 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Whet
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10144822
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/ConnectionManager.scala ---
@@ -53,6 +54,10 @@ private[spark] class ConnectionManager(port: Int, conf:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37#issuecomment-36297711
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/12921/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37#issuecomment-36297710
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10144775
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/Connection.scala ---
@@ -18,25 +18,27 @@
package org.apache.spark.network
import org.apac
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10144726
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/Connection.scala ---
@@ -18,25 +18,27 @@
package org.apache.spark.network
import org.apac
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10144358
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/ui/WorkerWebUI.scala ---
@@ -198,6 +199,6 @@ class WorkerWebUI(val worker: Worker, val workDir:
F
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10144156
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -100,17 +152,12 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
* If the
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10144073
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10143842
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10143746
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37#issuecomment-36294696
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37#issuecomment-36294679
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37#issuecomment-36294680
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37#issuecomment-36294278
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
GitHub user pwendell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37
[HOTFIX] Patching maven build after #6 (SPARK-1121).
That patch removed the Maven avro declaration but didn't remove the
actual dependency in core. /cc @scrapcodes
You can merge this pull request
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29#issuecomment-36293609
No problem. I attached a new patch that does this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user ngbinh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26#issuecomment-36292181
@pwendell Yes! You can point to https://github.com/ngbinh/spark-vagrant
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26#issuecomment-36291938
@ngbinh when we launch a list of contrib projects, would you be interested
in being included in it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10142402
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ class SparkContext(
val isLocal = (master == "local" || m
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10141554
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10141281
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33#discussion_r10141220
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SecurityManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
