Re: [DISCUSS] Reject partitioned topic creation when the topic name contains the `partition` keyword.

Hi Mattison, I did a quick reading and verify the PR on standalone, and I have a question: If the topic name contains `-partition-`, it is expected to reject to create a partitioned topic. However it will auto-create a non-partition topic with `-partition-`. But our `allowAutoTopicCreationType` i

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-181: Pulsar Shell

Hi Nicolò Boschi, The Pulsar Shell is really cool and I like it. And also I have a question: > I'd like to target this feature for 2.11 Will it be possible to use Pulsar Shell in the legacy version of Pulsar, in other words, could we cherry-pick the PR to another branch easily? Thanks, Xiaoyu

Re: [VOTE] PIP-181: Pulsar Shell

+1 (non-binding) tison 于2022年7月4日周一 22:54写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > I love this new tool :) > > Best, > tison. > > > Nicolò Boschi 于2022年7月4日周一 22:45写道： > > > Dear Community, > > > > I would like to start a VOTE on "PIP-181: Pulsar Shell" > > > > The proposal can be read at [0] and the discussi

[DISSCUSS]PIP-181: Reduce unnecessary REST call in broker

Hi Pulsar community: I open a pip to discuss "Reduce unnecessary REST call in broker" Proposal Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16422 --- ## Motivation The design of admin API now is such that: when handle a partitioned topic request, the broker will query the topic's partition me

Re: [DISSCUSS]PIP-181: Reduce unnecessary REST call in broker

There is a conflict in PIP numbers. The issue has moved to PIP-183. Also there is not only one method that should be modified, I will use this PIP to track all of them. Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Anon Hxy 于2022年7月6日周三 22:12写道： > Hi Pulsar community: > > I open a pip to discuss "Redu

Re: [VOTE] [PIP-182] Provide new load balance placement strategy implementation for ModularLoadManagerStrategy

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Qiang Huang 于2022年7月8日周五 14:32写道： > Hi Pulsar Community, > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Provide new load balance placement > strategy implementation for ModularLoadManagerStrategy" (PIP-182). > The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsa

Re: [DISCUSS] [PIP-179] Support the admin API to check unknown request parameters

+1 Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Zike Yang 于2022年6月27日周一 13:16写道： > +1 > > Zike Yang > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:26 AM PengHui Li wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Penghui > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:53 AM Yubiao Feng > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, Pulsar community: > > > > > > I open a pip to discuss "Suppor

Re: CI - remove cmd line test retries?

Hi Boschi I support this plan and I think we need take some effort to make the Pulsar CI more stable. Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Nicolò Boschi 于2022年7月11日周一 22:14写道： > Hi all, > > I'd like to start a discussion about the stability of Pulsar CI. > > It is common that some tests suite in our CI times ou

Re: Batch Messages with only 1 message

+1 Good idea Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Enrico Olivelli 于2022年7月12日周二 15:54写道： > Hello, > I think that we could implement a small but effective enhancement to > batching. > > It may happen that even if you enable batching you come to create > entries with 1 only message. > > Processing batch messages r

Re: Batch Messages with only 1 message

Hi Enrico I am interesting in working on this task. Could you please assign the work to me? @AnonHxy Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Enrico Olivelli 于2022年7月12日周二 22:28写道： > Thank you all ! > > I am going to create a issue/feature request > > Is there anyone interested in working on that ? > > We need a P

Re: Batch Messages with only 1 message

Go it, thanks Enrico Best, Xiaoyu Hou Enrico Olivelli 于2022年7月12日周二 22:40写道： > Xiaoyu > > Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 16:36 Anon Hxy > ha scritto: > > > > Hi Enrico > > > > I am interesting in working on this task. Could you please assign the >

Re: Batch Messages with only 1 message

Hi Matteo > Brokers are never going to look into batches, they will just check at the batch header, without decompression, and not dig into the individual messages properties I agree with this. The PIP-105 doesn't support batch send I think. PIP-105 maybe is not a good case for this changing. Th

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitHub Discussion for user-facing discussion

+1 tison 于2022年7月12日周二 18:01写道： > Hi, > > In the previous email[1] I started a discussion about enabling GitHub > Discussions in apache/pulsar repository and we meet a consensus to avoid > making development discussions truth happen on the sources. It's also a > requirement of INFRA team[2] > >

[DISCUSS]PIP-189: No batching if only one message in batch

Hi Pulsar community: I open a pip to discuss "No batching if only one message in batch" Proposal Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16619 --- ## Motivation The original discussion mail : https://lists.apache.org/thread/5svpl5qp3bfoztf5fvtojh51zbklcht2 linked issue: https://github.c

Re: [DISCUSS]PIP-189: No batching if only one message in batch

operty, but this is something that we > never did in the Pulsar API. > > I know that it will be a pain to fix internal Pulsar tests about > batching, because we won't be guaranteed anymore to create batch > messages. > > > Enrico > > Il giorno ven 15 lug 2022 alle

[DISCUSS] PIP-191: Support batched message using entry filter

Hi Pulsar community: I open a pip to discuss "Support batched message using entry filter" Proposal Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16680 --- ## Motivation We already have a plug-in way to filter entries in broker, aka PIP-105 https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12269. But th

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-191: Support batched message using entry filter

growing quickly, we can't break things without a clear path > for the users and for the developers of extensions > > Enrico > > > Il giorno gio 21 lug 2022 alle ore 12:45 Qiang Huang > ha scritto: > > > > Good. +1 > > > > Anon Hxy 于2022年7月19日周二 18:0

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-191: Support batched message using entry filter

| | msg6 | | | Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Anon Hxy 于2022年7月19日周二 18:00写道： > Hi Pulsar community: > > I open a pip to discuss "Support batched message using entry filter" > > Proposal Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16680 > --- >

[VOTE]PIP-189: No batching if only one message in batch.

Dear Community, I would like to start a VOTE on "PIP-189: No batching if only one message in batch." The proposal can be read at [0] and the discussion thread is available at [1] and the PR link is available at [2] Voting will stay open for at least 48h. [0] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/iss

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP 194 : Pulsar client: seek command add epoch

+1, Good work. Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Qiang Huang 于2022年7月24日周日 22:25写道： > Hi Pulsar community: > I open a pip to discuss "Pulsar client: seek command add epoch" > Proposal Link: > >- issue link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16757 > > -- > ## Motivation > `Reader` belongs to exclusiv

Re: [VOTE]PIP-189: No batching if only one message in batch.

022年7月25日周一 13:17写道： > > > > > +1(non-binding) > > > > > > Best, > > > Mattison > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 10:35, Haiting Jiang > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Micheal Marshall as a new PMC member in Pulsar

Congratulations, Micheal. Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Enrico Olivelli 于2022年7月26日周二 23:22写道： > I am glad to announce that the Apache Pulsar PMC invited Micheal to > join the PMC and he accepted. > > Micheal is doing a great job in stewarding our community > > Please join me and celebrate ! > > Enrico Ol

Re: [VOTE] PIP-180: Shadow Topic, an alternative way to support readonly topic ownership

+1(non-binding) Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Haiting Jiang 于2022年8月1日周一 10:23写道： > Dear Community, > > I would like to restart the VOTE on "PIP-180: Shadow Topic, an alternative > way to support readonly topic ownership." > > The proposal is updated since last vote and all can be read at [0] and the > di

Re: [Vote] PIP 198: Standardize PR Naming Convention using GitHub Actions

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Yu 于2022年8月4日周四 16:13写道： > Hi team, > > It has been 4 months since we discussed the [Guideline] Pulsar PR Naming > Convention [1]. > > Nowadays, when reading the PR list [2], you’ll find more and more people > follow and get used to this rule. > > It improves

Re: [DISCUSS] Create a new Github Project to track the flaky tests

+1 Good idea. We are on the way making CI more robust Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou PengHui Li 于2022年8月10日周三 16:35写道： > Hi all, > > For better tracking flaky test fix, I have tried to create a Github > Project under the Pulsar repo https://github.com/apache/pulsar/projects/11 > (It can be removed if we do

[VOTE] PIP-191: Support batched message using entry filter

Dear Community, I'd like to start a VOTE on "PIP-191: Support batched message using entry filter." The proposal can be read at [0] and the discussion thread is available at [1] Voting will stay open for at least 48h. [0] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16680 [1] https://lists.apache.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Jiwei Guo as a new PMC member in Pulsar

Congratulations! Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou PengHui Li 于2022年8月18日周四 19:25写道： > Hi, all > > I'm glad to announce that the Apache Pulsar PMC invited Jiwei Guo to join > the > PMC and he accepted. > > Please join in celebrating! > > Best, > Penghui >

Re: [VOTE]PIP-189: No batching if only one message in batch.

1 PM Enrico Olivelli > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > This is a small improvement but a great impact !! > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > Il giorno mar 26 lug 2022 all

Re: [VOTE] [PIP-169] Support split bundle by flow or qps

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou lordcheng10 <1572139...@qq.com.invalid> 于2022年8月23日周二 15:10写道： > Hi Pulsar Community, I would like to start a VOTE on "Support split bundle > by flow or qps."(PIP-169) > Here is the design detail: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16782 > > > and the dis

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.10.2 release

+1 Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Haiting Jiang 于2022年8月23日周二 22:10写道： > Hello, Pulsar community: > > I'd like to propose to release Apache Pulsar 2.10.2 > > Currently, we have 189 commits [0] labeled with `release/2.10.2`, > And 39 of them are not cherry-picked yet [1]. > > And there are 39 open PRs [2],

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.11.0 Release

Hi jiwei Sorry for late reply. I'd like to add PIP189 to 2.11.0, is it possible now - PIP 189: No batching if only one message in batch. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16605 Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou guo jiwei 于2022年8月24日周三 10:16写道： > Hi all, >We have merged all the blocker patches, and

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-Enable read-only partition, add read and write control for a single partition.

Hi Mingyu > expanding partitions or modifying consumption logic cannot reduce the consumption of new messages in time If I understand correctly, we will no need message order guarantee if applied this feature. If so, I think that expanding partitions can alse solve the problem: Consumer and

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.5 Candidate 3

Hi Michael, I also couldn't reproduce it with the same steps Haiting provided. Here is my local environment info with `mvn -v` Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f) Maven home: /Users/didi/Documents/apache-maven-3.6.3 Java version: 1.8.0_291, vendor: Oracle Corporation,

Re: [VOTE] [PIP-204] Extensions for BrokerInterceptor

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Aloys Zhang 于2022年8月30日周二 19:02写道： > Hi devs, > > This is the VOTE thread for PIP-204 Extensions for BrokerInterceptor. > > PIP issue: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/17267 > > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/3zgpbxffo7gzsb5mdh0s

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-209: Separate C++/Python clients to own repositories

+1 LGTM Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Enrico Olivelli 于2022年9月26日周一 17:39写道： > +100 to this ! > > Thanks for this proposal > > Enrico > > Il giorno lun 26 set 2022 alle ore 10:04 Zike Yang ha > scritto: > > > > +1. Looks good to me. > > > > Do we need to move the `Apache Pulsar / Multi Clients` Github pr

Re: [VOTE] PIP-209: Separate C++/Python clients to own repositories

+1 (non binding) Thanks, Xiaoyu Hou Nicolò Boschi 于2022年9月27日周二 16:39写道： > +1 (non binding) > Nicolò Boschi > > > Il giorno mar 27 set 2022 alle ore 10:17 Qiang Huang < > qiang.huang1...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Yunze Xu 于2022年9月27日周二 11:35写道： > > > > > +1 (non-bin