Dear community,
The Apache Pulsar team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Pulsar Helm Chart 3.7.0.
This is the first Apache Pulsar Helm chart release to support Pulsar
4.0.0 release.
The official source release, as well as the binary Helm Chart release,
are available at
https://down
+1 (binding)
-Lari
On 2024/10/31 03:24:22 xiangying meng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I`d like to start a vote for PIP-389: Add Producer config
> compressMinMsgBodySize to improve compression performance.
>
> Proposal Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23526
> Discussion Link:
> https://lists.
+1(binding)
Thanks,
Baodi Shi
Aloys Zhang 于2024年10月31日周四 11:53写道：
>
> +1
>
> Heesung Sohn 于2024年10月31日周四 04:11写道：
> >
> > +1(non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Heesung
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:52 PM Zike Yang wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Zike Yang
> > >
> >
Hello all,
The vote to release Apache Pulsar Helm Chart version 3.7.0 based on
3.7.0-candidate-1 is now closed.
The vote PASSED with 3 binding "+1" votes:
"+1" Binding votes:
David Jensen
Jiwei Guo
Lari Hotari
I'll continue with the release process and the release announcement will follow
sho
Hi all,
I think we can refactor/split the `tests` module(the integration test
module) to reuse the integration test code better.
Currently, there are good test classes to reuse(such as topic message
test cases, container setup, and other test util funcs), but this
module is built under "test" sco
This is a good start to. I have another suggestion. Currently we
relied heavily on mock ZK and BK services. However, if we're not going
to mock some behaviors of ZK or BK, it might not be good. I have
encountered the following error logs in the downstream application:
```
12:28:36.903 [ZKMetadata
Hi,
> if we're not going to mock some behaviors of ZK or BK, it might not be good.
I agree. I think we can put/move more tests in the integration tests,
especially for those tests that are based on client and admin calls
only.
Also, we need to think about how to optimize the integration test runs
LGTM, the current test code is relatively confusing, and this proposal can
improve this situation.
--
Best Regards！
crossoverJie
Heesung Sohn 于2024年11月1日周五 06:16写道：
> Hi all,
>
> I think we can refactor/split the `tests` module(the integration test
> module) to reuse the integration test code
