> But why do I find that some PRs have already been released in version v0.12.1?
Yes. This change
list(https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/compare/v0.12.1...master)
is inconsistent. Some PRs have already been released.
I have updated the milestone for version 0.13.0. And this should be
the
Hi Apurva,
Thanks for applying the changes to the proposal.
It looks good and given the time since it was already created, please feel
free to move to a vote at any time.
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 8:35 PM Apurva Telang
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I had submitted PIP-337 a few mon
Hi all,
I'm doubting the value of the widely used Netty Recycler in Pulsar.
When I checked the recent commits today, I found even a pair of
Boolean and Integer is wrapped as a recyclable object. See
TopicExistsInfo in https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22838. It's
really a mess, especially comp
Hi all
> Addational: I want to cherry-pick it to `branch-3.3` too.
Cherry-picked.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 8:53 AM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Addational: I want to cherry-pick it to `branch-3.3` too.
>
> The thread will remain open for 48 hours.
> If there is no objection, I will perform t
Cherry-picked
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 8:52 AM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Now `3.0.x` has this fix, but the newest version(`3.3.x`) doesn't contain
> this fix, which is somewhat confusing, so I want to cherry-pick it to
> `branch-3.3`.
>
> The thread will remain open for
All,
Looks like there is little interest in this proposal. I will wait for few
more days and close this.
Thanks for reading.
Naresh
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 at 8:35 PM, Zixuan Liu wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/4696 is different from this PIP.
> When using mTLS authentication, the
