[VOTE] Release Apache Pulsar Helm Chart 3.2.0 based on 3.2.0-candidate-3

2024-01-21 Thread Lari Hotari
Hello Apache Pulsar Community, This is a call for the vote to release the Apache Pulsar Helm Chart version 3.2.0. Release notes for 3.2.0-candidate-3: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/releases/tag/pulsar-3.2.0-candidate-3 The release candidate is available at: https://dist.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pulsar Helm Chart 3.2.0 based on 3.2.0-candidate-2

2024-01-21 Thread Lari Hotari
This release vote is cancelled since there's a new vote out for Apache Pulsar Helm Chart 3.2.0-candidate-3: https://lists.apache.org/thread/6wst9jqg0w9otyn4ltwoq574029czoqy -Lari On 2024/01/18 06:06:45 Lari Hotari wrote: > Hello Apache Pulsar Community, > > This is a call for the vote to releas

Re: [VERIFY] Pulsar Release 3.2.0 Candidate 3

2024-01-21 Thread Lari Hotari
Thank you for reviewing and merging the PR #21937 (restoring the broker id format). I have cherry-picked that to branch-3.2 together with it's dependency PR #21894 (fixes leader broker election when advertised listeners is configured) and in addition #21871 (pulsar-bom). >From my side we are re

Re: [DISCUSS] Possibility of including Pulsar BOM (PIP-326) in 3.2.0 RC2

2024-01-21 Thread Lari Hotari
Since there's going to be one more release candidate for 3.2.0 , I have cherry-picked PIP-326 (pulsar-bom) to branch-3.2. pulsar-bom is a low risk addition to the release. -Lari On 2024/01/18 17:54:22 Chris Bono wrote: > The Pulsar BOM (PIP-326) implementation missed the initial timeline to > b

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.12.0 Candidate 2

2024-01-21 Thread Zike Yang
Hi yunze, Thanks for reporting this. Actually, the `VERSION` file is not used in the code even before that PR. We currently have two hardcoded version files in place: `VERSION` which represents the current version and `stable.txt` which represents the current stable version. However, I'm curious

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.12.0 Candidate 2

2024-01-21 Thread Yunze Xu
I agree with retaining this file in this 0.12.0 release to avoid some unexpected changes. We can estimate whether it's safe to remove the VERSION file later. Thanks, Yunze On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:18 AM Zike Yang wrote: > > Hi yunze, > > Thanks for reporting this. Actually, the `VERSION` file