MMirelli commented on PR #126:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/126#issuecomment-1173156732
Opened https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16362
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
MMirelli closed pull request #126: Update out-of-sync url to get openssl.cnf in
TLS transport documentation
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/126
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
SignorMercurio commented on PR #132:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/132#issuecomment-1173255575
> I'll ask the community whether to show company info or not.
I think the phonebook page does not contain the information about
committers' companies, so newly added commit
Hi team,
We're updating [1] the "Meet the Community" info [2] since the current info
is obsolete.
Several questions on how to show the info:
==
Q1: only show PMC members and add a tip?
Context:
a. Nowadays, we have more and more PMC members (30 in total) and committers
(62 in
michaeljmarshall opened a new pull request, #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/133
Main issues: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14838
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13916
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16094
## Motivation
The curren
michaeljmarshall commented on PR #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/133#issuecomment-1173351514
@urfreespace - I did not realize just how big these Javadoc files were until
opening this PR. This PR literally adds 8 million lines of generated Javadocs.
Should we add the sc
michaeljmarshall commented on PR #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/133#issuecomment-1173353058
Looks like the generated docs from the broker for all versions are about 304
MB.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
Hi team (especially release managers),
Since we have a new Pulsar Release Notes page [1], the workflow of
submitting release notes is changed.
I've documented steps and added examples on the wiki [2], please follow the
new rules.
Feel free to comment, thank you!
[1] https://pulsar.apache.org/re
SignorMercurio opened a new pull request, #134:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/134
Close apache/pulsar#16180.
Screenshot:

--
This is an automa
michaeljmarshall commented on PR #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/133#issuecomment-1173363143
Interestingly, the following returns now results:
```shell
grep -R "/api/pulsar-broker" content/docs/
```
That indicates to me that the website doesn't actual
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Hang
Lan Liang 于2022年7月1日周五 18:03写道:
>
> +1,NB
>
>
> - lan.liang
> Replied Message
> | From | Enrico Olivelli |
> | Date | 6/30/2022 18:35 |
> | To | Dev |
> | Subject | Re: [VOTE] [PIP-179] Support the admin API to check unknown
> request parameters |
> +1 (bindi
Hi Yu,
Thanks for starting this discussion. Here are my two coins.
1. For showing membership, I suggest you take a look at SkyWalking's Team
page[1]. As the Pulsar ecosystem grows larger and larger, the framework
SkyWalking's Team page used is a good fit IMO.
2. For organization affinity, I sugge
The PIP passes with 3 bindings +1: Hang Chen, Penghui Li, and Jia Zhai. I
will start working, Please help to move to the wiki. Thanks
Yubiao Feng
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 9:37 AM Jia Zhai wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 11:35 AM Yubiao Feng
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Matteo, Enrico, LinLin
> >
>
13 matches
Mail list logo