Can we start with making Pulsar is able to run with both Java 8 and Java
11?
Because I think there are still a lot of users running with Java 8.
- Sijie
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 2:32 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hello Pulsar community,
> I would like to start a discussion about Java 11 support an
Sijie,
Il giorno mar 9 feb 2021 alle ore 09:42 Sijie Guo ha
scritto:
> Can we start with making Pulsar is able to run with both Java 8 and Java
> 11?
>
That's exactly my proposal for the short term (2.8) in the footer of my
initial message:
>> I believe that enforcing JDK11 on the server side
Lari,
We know that there will be work to do, I am happy to do what is needed in
order to make this work
Thanks for pointing it out
Enrico
Il giorno mar 9 feb 2021 alle ore 09:44 Enrico Olivelli
ha scritto:
> Sijie,
>
> Il giorno mar 9 feb 2021 alle ore 09:42 Sijie Guo ha
> scritto:
>
>> Can we
Hi Jonathan,
This only represents my opinion. It doesn't present any formal decisions.
In the past few years, the community has tried to make the project website
to be focused on the project documentation and releases themselves. We
encourage the community members to publish the blog posts includ
Hi Yuri,
Regarding the authn/authz issue, @Matteo Merli can
probably chime in more about that part.
If the lazy-loading approach sounds attractive to you and you like it,
maybe the next step is to update the PIP, what do you think?
- Sijie
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:57 PM Yuri Mizushima
wrote:
sijie merged pull request #104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/104
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
LGTM if I don’t understand wrong.
In short, there’re two key points:
1. Keep the code compatible with Java 8.
2. Release the binaries that are built on JDK 11 to get the benefit.
So Java 8 users can still build Pulsar with JDK 8 but the default releases are
built on JDK 11.
- Yunze
Yunze,
It's not exactly as you write.
We will be building and testing on JDK11.
Binaries, both server and client, will be able to run on jdk8
Building on jdk11 targeting jdk8 does not bring much benefit as you cannot
use jdk11 features and also the byte code will look like the jdk8 version
(for
I agree that SEO is an important aspect here.
When I google [apache pulsar use cases], here are the top ten, with actual
case studies marked with *. (If I leave out Apache, the results are
similar but a Confluent article creeps into the top 5.)
1. kesque.com 7 Reasons We Chose Apache Pulsar
2. *
For me this gets into a bigger issue. That issue for me is that right now, I
need to visit half a dozen sites to get the full picture of Pulsar.
Putting content like this on a separate site and linking to it from Pulsar
doesn’t create the proper journey in my mind.
I don’t know if it should be
You're right, Kafka does a really good job here. Here's a proposal along
those lines:
1. Add a Get Started section to the site modeled on Kafka's
a. Introduction
b. Quickstart
c. Use cases -- this would be a blog-like section
Not included:
d. books&papers and podcasts we can ignore f
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:02 PM Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> You're right, Kafka does a really good job here. Here's a proposal along
> those lines:
>
> 1. Add a Get Started section to the site modeled on Kafka's
>a. Introduction
>b. Quickstart
>c. Use cases -- this would be a blog-like se
12 matches
Mail list logo
