RE: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread Shusuke Tsuda
+1 (non-binding) - check signatures/checksums - compile the source - standalone/producer/consumer worked Thanks, Shusuke Tsuda -Original Message- From: PengHui Li Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 9:32 AM To: Dev Subject: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1 This is the first releas

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] munir131 opened a new issue #134: Getting error while installing

2020-11-25 Thread GitBox
munir131 opened a new issue #134: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/134 I am getting below error while, I am trying to install this package on Alpine ``` bash-5.0# npm install pulsar-client npm WARN deprecated request@2.88.2: request has been deprecated, s

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+0 (non-binding) - verified checksums and sigs - run smoke tests on the binary tarball - built from sources and run "pulsar standalone" from the resulting binaries - built on Mac and on Fedora, with JDK8 (AdoptOpenJDK) My vote is not a full +1 because if I run the sources there is a non-transient

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread PengHui Li
Thanks Enrico, Could you please also help create an issue for the PrometheusMetricsTest? We can fix it in the next release version. Thanks, Penghui On Nov 25, 2020, 9:06 PM +0800, Enrico Olivelli , wrote: > +0 (non-binding) > > - verified checksums and sigs > - run smoke tests on the binary tarba

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il giorno mer 25 nov 2020 alle ore 14:18 PengHui Li ha scritto: > Thanks Enrico, > > Could you please also help create an issue for the PrometheusMetricsTest? > Sure, this is a pull request with a fix https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/8702 The problem is more about PulsarVersion, in which t

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread PengHui Li
Thanks Enrico. Penghui On Nov 25, 2020, 9:58 PM +0800, Enrico Olivelli , wrote: > Il giorno mer 25 nov 2020 alle ore 14:18 PengHui Li > ha scritto: > > > Thanks Enrico, > > > > Could you please also help create an issue for the PrometheusMetricsTest? > > > > Sure, > this is a pull request with a

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread Sijie Guo
+1 (binding) - check signatures/checksums - Validate Pub/Sub and Java Functions - Validate Stateful Functions - Sijie On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 6:37 AM PengHui Li wrote: > Thanks Enrico. > > Penghui > On Nov 25, 2020, 9:58 PM +0800, Enrico Olivelli , > wrote: > > Il giorno mer 25 nov 2020 all

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] coryvirok commented on issue #133: How to clean up consumers/producers on SIGINT

2020-11-25 Thread GitBox
coryvirok commented on issue #133: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/133#issuecomment-733844778 Correct. Thanks for clarifying the roadmap. I'll give it some thought to see if I can think of any ways to make this more idiomatic without having to change the C++ core.

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread Yong Zhang
+1 (non-binding) - start standalone service - produce and consume messages - query the last message using pulsar-sql --- Yong On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 23:38, Sijie Guo wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - check signatures/checksums > - Validate Pub/Sub and Java Functions > - Validate Stateful Function

[GitHub] [pulsar-dotpulsar] alexsandro-xpt commented on pull request #48: Producer for Partitioned topics

2020-11-25 Thread GitBox
alexsandro-xpt commented on pull request #48: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/48#issuecomment-734013259 +1 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log o

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread Nozomi Kurihara
Hi PengHui, I'm sorry but could you include the following PR? https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/8697 Unfortunately it looks a blocker since pulsar-client shaded jar doesn't work now... Best Regards, Nozomi 差出人: Yong Zhang 送信日時: 2020年11月26日 9:44 宛先: dev@puls

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread PengHui Li
Hi Nozomi, Can we move this fix to 2.6.3 or 2.7.1? We will release 2.6.3 after 2.7.0 release soon. Thanks, Penghui Penghui On Nov 26, 2020, 9:22 AM +0800, Nozomi Kurihara , wrote: > Hi PengHui, > > I'm sorry but could you include the following PR? > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/8697 >

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread xiaolong ran
+1 (non-binding) - check signatures/checksums - compile the source - Test pulsar-function-runtime and pulsar-function-worker unit test case - Validate Connectors - Validate Pub/Sub and Java Functions - Validate Stateful Functions -- Thanks Xiaolong Ran 在 2020年11月23日 +0800 AM8:33,PengHui Li ,写道: >

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread Nozomi Kurihara
Hi Penghui, IMO we should fix this type of issue as many as possible before releasing since once officially released, the artifact will remain forever and any user can use it. Thank you so much for your driving this release process and I'm very sorry to stop this release, but please could you

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.0 Candidate 1

2020-11-25 Thread PengHui Li
Thank you very much @Nozomi, it’s a serious problem for pulsar-client. I have reproduced on my laptop. I will start the RC-2 as soon as possible. Thanks, Penghui Penghui On Nov 26, 2020, 10:01 AM +0800, Nozomi Kurihara , wrote: > Hi Penghui, > > IMO we should fix this type of issue as many as p