> On Jan 7, 2022, at 2:59 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:27 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>>> I believe 48 hours vote is only for PIP, which was agreed in the dev@.
>>
>> I would like to understand why Matteo chose 48 hours for this process.
>> What’s the hurry?
>
> Since we
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:27 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> > I believe 48 hours vote is only for PIP, which was agreed in the dev@.
>
> I would like to understand why Matteo chose 48 hours for this process. What’s
> the hurry?
Since we went from no formal process to "some" process, and since any
change
> On Jan 6, 2022, at 4:51 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> I believe 48 hours vote is only for PIP, which was agreed in the dev@.
I would like to understand why Matteo chose 48 hours for this process. What’s
the hurry?
In this discussion there is a mixture of discussion and +1. [1]
Did the project
I believe 48 hours vote is only for PIP, which was agreed in the dev@.
For other activities, this project follows the ASF 72 hours rule.
- Sijie
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 8:17 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Yes please! I did not notice that.
>
> Personally I would be ok with 72 hours lazy consensus, but
I agree that 72 hours should be the minimum.
For reference, this thread [0] from August 2021 proposed using 48
hours for the PIP voting period, and it explains why the wiki says 48
hours.
> (3) to allow time for contributors who are not working full time on the
> project.
I think this point is
Yes please! I did not notice that.
Personally I would be ok with 72 hours lazy consensus, but if we must vote then
72 hours is a minimum.
Thanks,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 3, 2022, at 8:10 PM, Haiting Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> The "48 hours" rule is on [1].
> Maybe we should up
Hi Dave,
The "48 hours" rule is on [1].
Maybe we should update the wiki and PIP template first?
[1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Pulsar-Improvement-Proposal-%28PIP%29
On 2022/01/04 03:59:45 Dave Fisher wrote:
> The ASF considers that the minimum time for a vote is 72 hours for a few
>
