Thanks for your feedback Enrico.
I'd appreciate any other thoughts on this process since I am proposing
a change to a recently implemented PIP.
Also, if we like this new direction, I think we should update our
GitHub issue template to communicate this new process. I already have
a PR for my propo
Michael,
Il Ven 24 Set 2021, 19:47 Michael Marshall ha
scritto:
> Hi Enrico,
>
> Thank you for raising this concern. Apparently acquiring a distributed
> lock on a PIP number is non-trivial :)
>
We could use the first 3 digits of a hash computed on the title of the PIP.
Just joking:)
> > What
It is funny that we have four unrelated PIP-95 proposals. By the above
principle, the true PIP 95 is "Smart Listener Selection with Multiple Bind
Addresses". :)
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:47 AM Michael Marshall
wrote:
> Hi Enrico,
>
> Thank you for raising this concern. Apparently acquiring a
Hi Enrico,
Thank you for raising this concern. Apparently acquiring a distributed
lock on a PIP number is non-trivial :)
> What about sending an email to dev in order to ask for a new PIP id ?
In this design, is it up to a committer (someone with write access to
the Wiki page) to reply to the re
