It is funny that we have four unrelated PIP-95 proposals. By the above principle, the true PIP 95 is "Smart Listener Selection with Multiple Bind Addresses". :)
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:47 AM Michael Marshall <mikemars...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Enrico, > > Thank you for raising this concern. Apparently acquiring a distributed > lock on a PIP number is non-trivial :) > > > What about sending an email to dev in order to ask for a new PIP id ? > > In this design, is it up to a committer (someone with write access to > the Wiki page) to reply to the request with a PIP number? I think this > could lead to confusion, as no one person would have the job and there > could be delays in responding. > > Instead of receiving a PIP number, I think we could ask users to > inspect the mailing list archive to determine the next PIP number. > Then, the mailing list is the source of truth for PIP numbers, and > there isn't any delay. This protocol can still have collisions if > multiple people send PIPs at the same time. However, I think these > collisions could be resolved quickly: the earliest email in the > archive wins, and others need to pick the next number(s). > > Also, this raises a secondary question for me. In our new PIP process, > are we copying PIPs from GitHub issues into the GitHub wiki? > > In order to push this conversation forward, I wrote a PR with my > proposed solution to the problem: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12176. I am not attached to my > solution per se, but I do think a solution to this problem should > include an update to the GitHub template to help new PIP writers > easily understand the process. > > > Does anyone volunteer to clean up the PIP list page ? > Once we settle on a protocol, we will need to clean up, as now we have > two PIP 97s. > > Thanks, > Michael > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 9:51 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Today I had to rename my PIP from PIP-93 to PIP-95 because PIP-93 was > > picked up. > > Then I realised that PIP95 already exists on GitHub, then I moved to > PIP-97. > > > > There are multiple PIP-95 on the Wiki page. > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki > > > > We need a way to assign new PIP ids > > > > What about sending an email to dev in order to ask for a new PIP id ? > > > > Only committers have write privileges to the Wiki pages, so any PIP id > > assignment needs a sponsor that assigns the PIP id and creates the wiki > > page. > > > > I propose to add a link to the PIP issue in the wiki page until the PIP > is > > accepted, > > because we recently decided to run PIP discussions as GH issues > > > > Does anyone volunteer to clean up the PIP list page ? > > > > Regards > > Enrico >
