Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 Looks great! Thanks, Cong > 2023年2月18日 06:44，Matteo Merli 写道： > > Since the LTS release model has been formally approved, I'm proposing > the following schedule for the release: > > * Tue - 2023-05-11 > - RC-1 > - Code Freeze -- Only critical fixes will be merged in the 3.0 > rele

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 Looks great! Thanks, Cong On 2023/02/17 22:44:34 Matteo Merli wrote: > Since the LTS release model has been formally approved, I'm proposing > the following schedule for the release: > > * Tue - 2023-05-11 >- RC-1 >- Code Freeze -- Only critical fixes will be merged in the 3.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 -- Thanks Xiaolong Ran Yubiao Feng 于2023年3月3日周五 14:38写道： > The same as Zike (^_^) > > Thanks to Matteo for initiating this release roadmap. I am interested in > this release. I'd also like to volunteer as a release manager for Apache > Pulsar 3.0.0 > > Thanks > Yubiao Feng > > On Sat, Feb 18

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

The same as Zike (^_^) Thanks to Matteo for initiating this release roadmap. I am interested in this release. I'd also like to volunteer as a release manager for Apache Pulsar 3.0.0 Thanks Yubiao Feng On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 6:44 AM Matteo Merli wrote: > Since the LTS release model has been fo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

Hi, Thanks to Matteo for initiating this release roadmap. I am interested in this release. I'd also like to volunteer as a release manager for Apache Pulsar 3.0.0. Thanks, Zike Yang On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:56 PM tison wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks for driving this effort! > > Also, I created htt

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 Thanks for driving this effort! Also, I created https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19570 to correspondingly update our website. Feel free to leave a comment. I'm going to send a draft in days. Best, tison. Enrico Olivelli 于2023年2月21日周二 19:20写道： > +1 > > Perfect > > Enrico > > Il gior

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 Perfect Enrico Il giorno mar 21 feb 2023 alle ore 08:11 Haiting Jiang ha scritto: > > +1 Looks great! > > > Haiting > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:11 PM Hang Chen wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Hang > > > > Christophe Bornet 于2023年2月20日周一 21:46写道： > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Also, I'

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 Looks great! Haiting On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:11 PM Hang Chen wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks, > Hang > > Christophe Bornet 于2023年2月20日周一 21:46写道： > > > > +1 > > > > Also, I'd like to volunteer as a release manager for this release. > > > > Christophe > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 17 févr. 2023 à

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 Thanks, Hang Christophe Bornet 于2023年2月20日周一 21:46写道： > > +1 > > Also, I'd like to volunteer as a release manager for this release. > > Christophe > > > > > Le ven. 17 févr. 2023 à 23:44, Matteo Merli a écrit : > > > > Since the LTS release model has been formally approved, I'm proposing > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 Also, I'd like to volunteer as a release manager for this release. Christophe Le ven. 17 févr. 2023 à 23:44, Matteo Merli a écrit : > > Since the LTS release model has been formally approved, I'm proposing > the following schedule for the release: > > * Tue - 2023-05-11 >- RC-1 >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 Zike Yang On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 4:43 PM wrote: > > +1 > On Feb 18, 2023, 14:56 +0800, Michael Marshall , wrote: > > +1 - this timeline sounds even better :) > > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 12:41 AM Matteo Merli > > wrote: > > > > > > Ups, > > > > > > I started from the release date I was

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 On Feb 18, 2023, 14:56 +0800, Michael Marshall , wrote: > +1 - this timeline sounds even better :) > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 12:41 AM Matteo Merli wrote: > > > > Ups, > > > > I started from the release date I was meaning April for the RCs: > > > > * Tue - 2023-04-11 > > * Tue - 2023-04-18 - R

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 - this timeline sounds even better :) On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 12:41 AM Matteo Merli wrote: > > Ups, > > I started from the release date I was meaning April for the RCs: > > * Tue - 2023-04-11 > * Tue - 2023-04-18 - RC-2 > * Tue - 2023-04-25 - RC-3 > * Tue - 2023-05-02 - Announce 3.0 Releas

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

Ups, I started from the release date I was meaning April for the RCs: * Tue - 2023-04-11 * Tue - 2023-04-18 - RC-2 * Tue - 2023-04-25 - RC-3 * Tue - 2023-05-02 - Announce 3.0 Release Sorry for the mixup! -- Matteo Merli On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:39 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > +1. > > I th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1. I think that there is a typo. See below. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 17, 2023, at 2:44 PM, Matteo Merli wrote: > > Since the LTS release model has been formally approved, I'm proposing > the following schedule for the release: > > * Tue - 2023-05-11 > - RC-1 > - Code Freeze

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 awesome plan. Thanks, Zixuan Michael Marshall 于2023年2月18日周六 14:33写道： > +1 I support this timeline. > > > I also wanted to propose trying out a model where we have 3 release > > managers for all major releases. > > Great idea, this will be a valuable improvement to our release > process. It a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

+1 I support this timeline. > I also wanted to propose trying out a model where we have 3 release > managers for all major releases. Great idea, this will be a valuable improvement to our release process. It also creates an opportunity for new committers to ease into the release management role.