+1 awesome plan.

Thanks,
Zixuan

Michael Marshall <mmarsh...@apache.org> 于2023年2月18日周六 14:33写道:

> +1 I support this timeline.
>
> > I also wanted to propose trying out a model where we have 3 release
> > managers for all major releases.
>
> Great idea, this will be a valuable improvement to our release
> process. It also creates an opportunity for new committers to ease
> into the release management role.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 4:44 PM Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Since the LTS release model has been formally approved, I'm proposing
> > the following schedule for the release:
> >
> >  * Tue - 2023-05-11
> >        - RC-1
> >        - Code Freeze -- Only critical fixes will be merged in the 3.0
> > release branch. Contributors should plan to have all the changes merged
> in
> > before this date. Exceptions should be extremely rare and strongly
> > motivated.
> >
> >  * Tue - 2023-05-18 - RC-2
> >  * Tue - 2023-05-25 - RC-3
> >  * Tue - 2023-05-02 - Announce 3.0 Release
> >
> > These dates will be published on the website to present users with a
> > "roadmap" and we should commit to and respect these dates.
> >
> > I also wanted to propose trying out a model where we have 3 release
> > managers for all major releases.
> >
> > The reasoning behind this is for this small group of people to
> collaborate
> > and divide the tasks for the release: merging patches from the "master"
> > branch, preparing RC, and testing.
> >
> > Since everyone also has other work duties and unexpected tasks that can
> pop
> > up at any time, it will help to have redundancy in the release-management
> > "team", so that we can release on the exact dates.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matteo
> >
> > --
> > Matteo Merli
> > <mme...@apache.org>
>

Reply via email to