+1 awesome plan. Thanks, Zixuan
Michael Marshall <mmarsh...@apache.org> 于2023年2月18日周六 14:33写道: > +1 I support this timeline. > > > I also wanted to propose trying out a model where we have 3 release > > managers for all major releases. > > Great idea, this will be a valuable improvement to our release > process. It also creates an opportunity for new committers to ease > into the release management role. > > Thanks, > Michael > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 4:44 PM Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Since the LTS release model has been formally approved, I'm proposing > > the following schedule for the release: > > > > * Tue - 2023-05-11 > > - RC-1 > > - Code Freeze -- Only critical fixes will be merged in the 3.0 > > release branch. Contributors should plan to have all the changes merged > in > > before this date. Exceptions should be extremely rare and strongly > > motivated. > > > > * Tue - 2023-05-18 - RC-2 > > * Tue - 2023-05-25 - RC-3 > > * Tue - 2023-05-02 - Announce 3.0 Release > > > > These dates will be published on the website to present users with a > > "roadmap" and we should commit to and respect these dates. > > > > I also wanted to propose trying out a model where we have 3 release > > managers for all major releases. > > > > The reasoning behind this is for this small group of people to > collaborate > > and divide the tasks for the release: merging patches from the "master" > > branch, preparing RC, and testing. > > > > Since everyone also has other work duties and unexpected tasks that can > pop > > up at any time, it will help to have redundancy in the release-management > > "team", so that we can release on the exact dates. > > > > Thanks, > > Matteo > > > > -- > > Matteo Merli > > <mme...@apache.org> >