+1
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020, 1:35 PM Shivji Kumar Jha wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Shivji Kumar Jha
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 4:05 AM Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to raise a discussion on deprecating the pulsar-flink connector
> in
> > the main repo.
> >
> > The connector in the
+1
Regards,
Shivji Kumar Jha
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 4:05 AM Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to raise a discussion on deprecating the pulsar-flink connector in
> the main repo.
>
> The connector in the main repo is based on Flink 1.6.0. Flink has evolved
> to 1.10.0. There are main diff
+1
Best Regards.
Jia Zhai
Beijing, China
Mobile: +86 15810491983
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:00 AM Ali Ahmed wrote:
> I have no objections.
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:56 AM Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> > It seems that there are no objections to this. I will go ahead update the
> > description u
I have no objections.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:56 AM Sijie Guo wrote:
> It seems that there are no objections to this. I will go ahead update the
> description using the pull request #6657.
>
> If you are using Pulsar with Flink, I'd suggest leaving comments at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/
It seems that there are no objections to this. I will go ahead update the
description using the pull request #6657.
If you are using Pulsar with Flink, I'd suggest leaving comments at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14146. This can help the Flink
community prioritize the task.
Thanks,
