+1 Best Regards.
Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:00 AM Ali Ahmed <alahmed...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have no objections. > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:56 AM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It seems that there are no objections to this. I will go ahead update the > > description using the pull request #6657. > > > > If you are using Pulsar with Flink, I'd suggest leaving comments at > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14146. This can help the > Flink > > community prioritize the task. > > > > Thanks, > > Sijie > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 3:35 PM Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to raise a discussion on deprecating the pulsar-flink > connector > > > in the main repo. > > > > > > The connector in the main repo is based on Flink 1.6.0. Flink has > evolved > > > to 1.10.0. There are main differences between Flink 1.6.0 and 1.10.0. > It > > is > > > hard for us to keep up the changes with upstream Flink versions. > > > > > > Since there is already a newer version pulsar-flink connector in Flink > > > Packages ecosystem and FLIP-72 > > > < > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-72%3A+Introduce+Pulsar+Connector > > > > > > is tracking the process adding the connector to upstream. I would > suggest > > > updating the status of the connector and consider deprecating it to > > > encourage people to consume the upstream one. > > > > > > So I created a PR to update the status of this connector: > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6657 > > > > > > We should consider removing it at some point in the future. Let me know > > > what you think. If you have any questions, feel free to comment on the > > pull > > > request as well. > > > > > > - Sijie > > > > > >
