Thanks
Enrico
Il giorno mar 23 feb 2021 alle ore 10:43 Yong Zhang <
zhangyong1025...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> I have pushed the old image.
>
> We can push a new image with a new tag after the issue is addressed.
>
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 16:09, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> > I am sorry.
> > I su
I have pushed the old image.
We can push a new image with a new tag after the issue is addressed.
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 16:09, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> I am sorry.
> I supposed that the new image would have had a new tag and that it did not
> override the previous one.
>
> Can we push the old
I am sorry.
I supposed that the new image would have had a new tag and that it did not
override the previous one.
Can we push the old image to docker hub ?
In the meantime we can add the missing dependencies to the Dockerfile
Enrico
Il giorno mar 23 feb 2021 alle ore 08:42 Yong Zhang <
zhangyon
Looks like the new image broken the CPP build.
I will try to use the old Dockerfile to build the
"apache/pulsar/pulsar-build" image
to make sure our CI back to normal.
Here is the issue: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/9682
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 05:08, Ali Ahmed wrote:
> I have pushed
I have pushed the new image to "apachepulsar/pulsar-build:ubuntu-16.04"
-Ali
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:05 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hello,
> we have merged a change to the Pulsar Builder image in order to allow
> builds to JDK11 (the default is still JDK8)
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/p
Hello,
we have merged a change to the Pulsar Builder image in order to allow
builds to JDK11 (the default is still JDK8)
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9609
Can you please publish the new image to Dockerhub ?
The new image also contains:
- Python 3 runtime (together with Python 2.7)
- Upgr
