I have pushed the old image. We can push a new image with a new tag after the issue is addressed.
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 16:09, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am sorry. > I supposed that the new image would have had a new tag and that it did not > override the previous one. > > Can we push the old image to docker hub ? > > In the meantime we can add the missing dependencies to the Dockerfile > > Enrico > > Il giorno mar 23 feb 2021 alle ore 08:42 Yong Zhang < > zhangyong1025...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Looks like the new image broken the CPP build. > > > > I will try to use the old Dockerfile to build the > > "apache/pulsar/pulsar-build" image > > to make sure our CI back to normal. > > > > Here is the issue: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/9682 > > > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 05:08, Ali Ahmed <ahmal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I have pushed the new image to "apachepulsar/pulsar-build:ubuntu-16.04" > > > > > > -Ali > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:05 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > we have merged a change to the Pulsar Builder image in order to allow > > > > builds to JDK11 (the default is still JDK8) > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9609 > > > > > > > > Can you please publish the new image to Dockerhub ? > > > > > > > > The new image also contains: > > > > - Python 3 runtime (together with Python 2.7) > > > > - Upgrade of Go Lang from 1.10 to 1.13 > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -Ali > > > > > >
