Re: New pip process reminder

2023-06-21 Thread tison
Looking into the discussion and reviewing our membership list, from module experts' distribution perspective, I agree that specific modules can have fewer PMC members overseeing. According to my experience in the Flink community[1] and the natural that improvement proposals are mainly about develo

Re: New pip process reminder

2023-06-21 Thread tison
> mostly part of one enterprise and only their PIP/PRs are moving forward No. PIPs are processed in a vendor natural bias. At least the difference between lazy consensus and at least 3 +1 binding votes won't change it. > help other community members to let them contribute to Pulsar so I'm doing

Re: New pip process reminder

2023-06-21 Thread Asaf Mesika
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:27 AM Zixuan Liu wrote: > I think we can reference https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > Votes on code modifications follow a different model. In this scenario, > a negative vote constitutes a veto , which the voting group (generally the > PMC of a project

Re: New pip process reminder

2023-06-21 Thread Zixuan Liu
I think we can reference https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > Votes on code modifications follow a different model. In this scenario, a > negative vote constitutes a veto , which the voting group (generally the PMC > of a project) cannot override. Again, this model may be modified by

Re: New pip process reminder

2023-06-20 Thread Asaf Mesika
I'm not a committer or PMC member, so I can't comment on this. I am curious to know the difference between other Apache projects and other foundation projects, such as CNCF, if you know about it. Do you think the Apache Foundation's view on individuals, not part of a commercial entity, does not li

Re: New pip process reminder

2023-06-20 Thread Rajan Dhabalia
Hi, > (" a lazy majority of at least 3 binding +1s votes") I don't think it's fair at this stage where majority Pulsar committers are mostly part of one enterprise and only their PIP/PRs are moving forward and PR/PIP created by other community members get blocked or not reviewed without any major

New pip process reminder

2023-06-20 Thread Asaf Mesika
Hi, This is just a reminder that PMC/Committers can only merge the PIP PR when the vote thread is concluded and in a positive manner, as described (" a lazy majority of at least 3 binding +1s votes") So please, before clicking that merge button, double-check those two conditions Thanks! Asaf