I'm not a committer or PMC member, so I can't comment on this.
I am curious to know the difference between other Apache projects and other
foundation projects, such as CNCF, if you know about it.
Do you think the Apache Foundation's view on individuals, not part of a
commercial entity, does not live up to today's state of affairs?
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:40 PM Rajan Dhabalia <rdhaba...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > (" a lazy majority of at least 3 binding +1s votes")
>
> I don't think it's fair at this stage where majority Pulsar committers are
> mostly part of one enterprise and only their PIP/PRs are moving forward and
> PR/PIP created by other community members get blocked or not reviewed
> without any major reasons. I can list down many different examples but I
> don't want to start that destructive discussion for now but I strongly ask
> to help other community members to let them contribute to Pulsar so, we can
> grow Pulsar community and let Pulsar be at the stage where it has
> committers from various different institutions and we have good number of
> reviewers to review PIP/PR on time.
> Right now, there are many examples where PRs are sitting unreviewed for a
> long time and we have to fix it first by encouraging and having more
> committers/reviewers across multiple organizations as a part of the Pulsar
> community. So, this is not the right time to restrict and this is
> indirectly making it difficult for many Pulsar committers and contributors
> who don't belong to specific enterprises.
>
> Thanks,
> Rajan
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:14 PM Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is just a reminder that PMC/Committers can only merge the PIP PR
> when
> > the vote thread is concluded and in a positive manner, as described (" a
> > lazy
> > majority of at least 3 binding +1s votes")
> >
> > So please, before clicking that merge button, double-check those two
> > conditions
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Asaf
> >
>
