Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.10.0 Candidate 2

2022-03-11 Thread PengHui Li
Hi all, There is a critical bug fix https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14664 we'd better have this one in 2.10.0 and 2.9.2. Please help review. Penghui On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:29 PM PengHui Li wrote: > Thanks @congbo for helping confirm the issue is not a regression in > 2.10.0 > https:/

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.10.0 Candidate 2

2022-03-11 Thread PengHui Li
Thanks @congbo for helping confirm the issue is not a regression in 2.10.0 https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14436#issuecomment-1064758710 I will start a new RC soon. Penghui On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 11:38 AM PengHui Li wrote: > Hi all, > > We found an issue https://github.com/apache/pulsa

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.10.0 Candidate 2

2022-03-03 Thread PengHui Li
Hi all, We found an issue https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/14436, This may be a new problem introduced in 2.10.0, need to confirm the issue and rollout the new RC. Thanks, Penghui On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 9:20 PM PengHui Li wrote: > Thanks Lari, > > I have cherry-picked https://github.com

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.10.0 Candidate 2

2022-03-02 Thread PengHui Li
Thanks Lari, I have cherry-picked https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14524 into branch-2.10 and will send out the new RC tomorrow. Penghui On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:30 PM Lari Hotari wrote: > -1 > > There was a thread leak in MLTransactionMetadataStore which also impacts > production code. >

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.10.0 Candidate 2

2022-03-02 Thread Lari Hotari
-1 There was a thread leak in MLTransactionMetadataStore which also impacts production code. It is fixed by https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14524 which is now merged to master branch. The thread leak resulted in a memory leak in tests and that's how I noticed it. The thread leak was also

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.10.0 Candidate 2

2022-03-01 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 (binding) - built on Mac, on JDK11 - RAT, checksums, signatures look good - tested the docker images, basic features - successfully run the Jakarta JMS 2.0 TCK (both client and server using 2.10.0 built from sources) without errors Only one little problem, that I don't consider blocker: a 2.10.

[VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.10.0 Candidate 2

2022-03-01 Thread PengHui Li
This is the second release candidate for Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 It fixes the following issues: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A2.10.0 +is%3Amerged+-label%3Arelease%2F2.9.1+-label%3Arelease%2F2.9.2 *** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay o