Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-23 Thread Matteo Merli
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 3:04 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Andras, > even if our rules allow to close a vote with a binding -1, we should > have to reach consensus and understand better Lari's motivations > > we are a community and accepting something with a -1 must be handled carefully > > I sugg

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-20 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Andras, even if our rules allow to close a vote with a binding -1, we should have to reach consensus and understand better Lari's motivations we are a community and accepting something with a -1 must be handled carefully I suggest to try to continue the discussion and try to converge Enrico Il

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-20 Thread Andras Beni
Thanks for your participation. I'm closing the vote. The proposal has been accepted with 4 binding +1, 1 binding -1 and 2 non-binding +1 votes. Best regards, Andras On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 11:11 AM Lari Hotari wrote: > -1 > > Hi Andras & Matteo, I'm sorry for the delay in my feedback. > > I vot

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-20 Thread Lari Hotari
-1 Hi Andras & Matteo, I'm sorry for the delay in my feedback. I voted -1 since I think that it would be more valuable to first analyze the existing problems before adding more intermediate solutions such as PIP-157. I'm fine if you want to go ahead and implement PIP-157 so I don't see the pr

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-19 Thread Lan Liang
+1 NB Best Regards, Lan Liang On 5/19/2022 17:30,PengHui Li wrote: +1 (binding) Thanks, Penghui On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 4:44 PM mattison chao wrote: +1 (non-binding) Best, Mattison On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 15:20, Enrico Olivelli wrote: +1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mer 18 mag 2022 a

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-19 Thread PengHui Li
+1 (binding) Thanks, Penghui On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 4:44 PM mattison chao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Mattison > > On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 15:20, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Enrico > > > > Il giorno mer 18 mag 2022 alle ore 08:54 Matteo Merli > > ha scritto: >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-19 Thread Hang Chen
+1 (binding) Thanks, Hang mattison chao 于2022年5月18日周三 16:44写道: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Mattison > > On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 15:20, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Enrico > > > > Il giorno mer 18 mag 2022 alle ore 08:54 Matteo Merli > > ha scritto: > > > > > > +1 > > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-18 Thread mattison chao
+1 (non-binding) Best, Mattison On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 15:20, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Enrico > > Il giorno mer 18 mag 2022 alle ore 08:54 Matteo Merli > ha scritto: > > > > +1 > > > > -- > > Matteo Merli > > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:40 PM Matteo Merli > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-18 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mer 18 mag 2022 alle ore 08:54 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > > +1 > > -- > Matteo Merli > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:40 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > > > > Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there > > were 2 positive feedbacks. > > I don't thin

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-17 Thread Matteo Merli
+1 -- Matteo Merli On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:40 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > > Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there > were 2 positive feedbacks. > I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would > have been better if the discussion happened then. > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-02 Thread Matteo Merli
Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there were 2 positive feedbacks. I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would have been better if the discussion happened then. As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a couple of misconcept

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-02 Thread Lari Hotari
-1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions. -Lari ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni kirjoitti: > Hi Pulsar Community, > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow more > topics per namespace" (PIP-157). > > The proposal can be read at https:

Re: [VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-02 Thread Enrico Olivelli
I left some questions. I am not sure we are ready to run a VOTE, this change will have a huge impact on Pulsar Enrico Il Lun 2 Mag 2022, 08:50 Andras Beni ha scritto: > Hi Pulsar Community, > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow more > topics per namespace" (PIP-

[VOTE] PIP-157: Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace

2022-05-01 Thread Andras Beni
Hi Pulsar Community, I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow more topics per namespace" (PIP-157). The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254 and the discussion thead is available at https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn