Lari & Enrico, the discussion thread was out for 11 days and there were 2 positive feedbacks. I don't think this qualifies as "too early for a vote" and it would have been better if the discussion happened then.
As for the comments in the other thread, I think there are only a couple of misconceptions on the proposal itself, as they are not actual problems (eg: managed ledger is not affected at all by this proposal, as the naming happens on top of it). Some parts can be clarified (as it is always the case), though I don't think it's a good idea to stop a vote at this point. Matteo -- Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 3:31 AM Lari Hotari <l...@hotari.net> wrote: > > -1. It's too early to start a vote. Let's first have discussions. > > -Lari > > ma 2. toukok. 2022 klo 9.50 Andras Beni <andras.b...@streamnative.io.invalid> > kirjoitti: > > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > > > I would like to start a VOTE on "Bucketing topic metadata to allow more > > topics per namespace" (PIP-157). > > > > The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15254 > > and the discussion thead is available at > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zx6s7hyrl2vy7nhdl79wh6gn88kxpd6k. > > > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h. > > > > Thanks, > > Andras > >
