+1 (binding)
We must have a flag to turn this on/off and disable it by default
(this will also be needed for the transition to the new method)
Enrico
Il giorno ven 9 dic 2022 alle ore 05:39 Yufei Zhang
ha scritto:
>
> Hi Enrico,
>
> Thank you for your feedback!
>
> I want to add more context to
Hi Enrico,
Thank you for your feedback!
I want to add more context to the issues you mentioned here:
1. Migration plan: The proposed changes are backward compatible, it still
allows the current configuration scheme (using command line), only that it
allows an optional alternative way of providin
Hi Enrico,
Sure, we can go back to the discussion thread and I'll pause this voting
thread for now until we address the concerns in the design.
Cheers,
Yufei
On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 6:05 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> -1 (binding)
> sorry I missed the discussion.
>
> It is not clear to me about th
-1 (binding)
sorry I missed the discussion.
It is not clear to me about the security model of this change.
The command line is not updatable for a process but other users may be able
to update the configuration file or access tokens or other security
parameters.
Also we need to define a migration
+1
Best,
Rui Fu
On Dec 8, 2022, 07:48 +0800, Yufei Zhang , wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm starting the vote for PIP-225: Pulsar Functions fetch parameters from
> local config file:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18744
>
> Here is the discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/3m6z7
Hi all,
I'm starting the vote for PIP-225: Pulsar Functions fetch parameters from
local config file:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18744
Here is the discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/3m6z7jgn71nzd3ng3x73vsxvd4b1jjcp
The vote will be open for at least 3 days.
Cheers,
Y
