Hi Enrico, Sure, we can go back to the discussion thread and I'll pause this voting thread for now until we address the concerns in the design.
Cheers, Yufei On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 6:05 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 (binding) > sorry I missed the discussion. > > It is not clear to me about the security model of this change. > The command line is not updatable for a process but other users may be able > to update the configuration file or access tokens or other security > parameters. > > Also we need to define a migration plan and draw well the upgrade story for > an existing cluster with running functions. In k8s it is possible that the > function use a different docker image than the function worker. > > I will follow up on the discussion thread > > > Enrico > > Il Gio 8 Dic 2022, 05:11 Rui Fu <r...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > +1 > > > > Best, > > > > Rui Fu > > On Dec 8, 2022, 07:48 +0800, Yufei Zhang <affei...@gmail.com>, wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'm starting the vote for PIP-225: Pulsar Functions fetch parameters > from > > > local config file: > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18744 > > > > > > Here is the discussion thread: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/3m6z7jgn71nzd3ng3x73vsxvd4b1jjcp > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Yufei > > >
