+1, It's a bug fix and the impact of adding this method is minimal.
Thanks,
Haiting
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 7:14 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> +1. I support cherry-picking it to release branches even if new
> default methods are added. It won't affect any existing use because
> the interface is customi
+1. I support cherry-picking it to release branches even if new
default methods are added. It won't affect any existing use because
the interface is customized by the 3rd party provider. No
compatibility issue will happen.
Thanks,
Yunze
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:27 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
>
Il giorno mar 14 mar 2023 alle ore 06:47 Gavin gao
ha scritto:
>
> The issue is: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19727
>
> This issue tries to address the index generator rolled back problem when
> entries add failed.
>
> A new default method `afterFailedAddEntry` is added to interface
> Man
The issue is: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19727
This issue tries to address the index generator rolled back problem when
entries add failed.
A new default method `afterFailedAddEntry` is added to interface
ManagedLedgerInterceptor.
And this change should be also cherry-picked to releas
