good proposal.
I support it.
I left a comment on the issue, about having a way to configure this from
configuration parameters and not by passing a Java object
Enrico
Il giorno ven 15 ott 2021 alle ore 09:59 r...@apache.org <
ranxiaolong...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Thanks PenghuiLi, I will try
Thanks PenghuiLi, I will try to base this PIP to provide the corresponding
code to implement.
LGTM +1(non-binding)
--
Thanks
Xiaolong Ran
PengHui Li 于2021年10月15日周五 下午3:56写道：
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12379
>
> --- Pasted here for quoting convenience ---
>
> ## Motivation
>
> Ap
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12379
--- Pasted here for quoting convenience ---
## Motivation
Apache Pulsar supports the at-least-once message delivery semantic which
can tolerate the consumer failure such as the consumer write the data to
the database but the database might offline fo
