Hi guys,
If there are no objections, I will send out the vote.
Best,
Hang
Hang Chen 于2024年5月7日周二 11:17写道：
>
> >It seems that we only need to keep `additionalSystemCursorNames`.
>
> Yes, we just use the `additionalSystemCursorNames`
>
> Best,
> Hang
>
> Zixuan Liu 于2024年5月6日周一 23:52写道：
> >
>It seems that we only need to keep `additionalSystemCursorNames`.
Yes, we just use the `additionalSystemCursorNames`
Best,
Hang
Zixuan Liu 于2024年5月6日周一 23:52写道：
>
> It seems that we only need to keep `additionalSystemCursorNames`.
>
> `systemCursorNames` is unnecessary, which should be built-i
It seems that we only need to keep `additionalSystemCursorNames`.
`systemCursorNames` is unnecessary, which should be built-in and immutable.
Thanks,
Zixuan
Hang Chen 于2024年5月6日周一 22:22写道：
> >We can make this "configurable", but the well known names should be always
> handled automatically
>
>
>We can make this "configurable", but the well known names should be always
handled automatically
I changed the configuration name to `additionalSystemCursorNames`. I
think the user should be defined as a Pulsar administrator. For
cursors that need to be ignored by TTL should be owned by Pulsar
in
Il giorno lun 6 mag 2024 alle ore 09:07 PengHui Li ha
scritto:
> For the backlog quota check, I think we also need the same capacity.
>
> For configurable. I think the reason is users can have their plugins
> running
> with the broker which relies on the Pulsar topic. They don't want the
> applic
For the backlog quota check, I think we also need the same capacity.
For configurable. I think the reason is users can have their plugins running
with the broker which relies on the Pulsar topic. They don't want the
application to
change the TTL or backlog policies for some subscription/cursor. Bu
Overall I support this idea, but the name 'systemCursorsNames' is not good
and we should not make it configurable.
First, we have to make a call to the TTL thing, otherwise we will end up in
using that for other stuff, and not only TTL.
Second, we shouldn't make this configurable. Those cursors d
LGTM,
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:02 PM Lari Hotari wrote:
> LGTM, very useful. Thanks for driving this.
>
> -Lari
>
> On 2024/05/04 16:01:41 Hang Chen wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I proposed a new proposal to improve the TTL impact on system
> > cursors. Please help take a look, t
LGTM, very useful. Thanks for driving this.
-Lari
On 2024/05/04 16:01:41 Hang Chen wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I proposed a new proposal to improve the TTL impact on system
> cursors. Please help take a look, thanks.
>
> PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22651
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
Hi Hang
Agree with you.
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:01 AM Hang Chen wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I proposed a new proposal to improve the TTL impact on system
> cursors. Please help take a look, thanks.
>
> PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22651
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
looks good
Hang Chen 于2024年5月5日 周日00:02写道：
> Hi guys,
> I proposed a new proposal to improve the TTL impact on system
> cursors. Please help take a look, thanks.
>
> PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22651
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
Hi guys,
I proposed a new proposal to improve the TTL impact on system
cursors. Please help take a look, thanks.
PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22651
Thanks,
Hang
12 matches
Mail list logo
