> What do you think about implementing a WASM function runtime directly?
> It could be on par with the current Java function runtime. If we
> define the API or SDK for WASM and Pulsar interaction, users could
> simply upload their WASM files and process messages just like a Pulsar
> function.
+1 .
Thanks for proposing this feature!
I replied in the PR.
Before reviewing this PIP, I thought it was an implementation of a
WASM function runtime.
IIUC, for this PIP, users need to first define a Java Pulsar function
and then construct the FunctionMap to interact with the wasm. Right?
Just share
Hi ZiCheng,
Brilliant suggestion!
I replied in the PR section, which I couldn't understand.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:18 PM dragon-zhang
wrote:
> Hi Pulsar Community,
>
> I want to add a new feature that supports run WASM bytecode to the
> pulsar-functions module.
>
> Please see the PIP: http
Hi Pulsar Community,
I want to add a new feature that supports run WASM bytecode to the
pulsar-functions module.
Please see the PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21992
Thanks,
ZiCheng Zhang
