Thanks for proposing this feature! I replied in the PR.
Before reviewing this PIP, I thought it was an implementation of a WASM function runtime. IIUC, for this PIP, users need to first define a Java Pulsar function and then construct the FunctionMap to interact with the wasm. Right? Just share my idea here: What do you think about implementing a WASM function runtime directly? It could be on par with the current Java function runtime. If we define the API or SDK for WASM and Pulsar interaction, users could simply upload their WASM files and process messages just like a Pulsar function. BR, Zike Yang On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 10:12 PM Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi ZiCheng, > > Brilliant suggestion! > > I replied in the PR section, which I couldn't understand. > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:18 PM dragon-zhang <zhangzich...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > > > I want to add a new feature that supports run WASM bytecode to the > > pulsar-functions module. > > > > Please see the PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21992 > > > > Thanks, > > ZiCheng Zhang
