Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-192 New Pulsar Broker Load Balancer

Hi Rajan, As discussed in the Pulsar Community Meeting today, I added the "Modification Summary" section that compares the current solutions and our proposals. Regards, Heesung On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:24 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 1:37 PM Rajan Dhabalia wrote: > > > A

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-192 New Pulsar Broker Load Balancer

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 1:37 PM Rajan Dhabalia wrote: > Also, here we have to clearly document that it will not impact behavior of > existing load-balancers now or in future. Pulsar is used by many companies > and orgs so, deprecating and not maintaining existing components is not > acceptable in

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-192 New Pulsar Broker Load Balancer

Hi Rajan, Please find my answers inline. Regards, Heesung On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 1:37 PM Rajan Dhabalia wrote: > Hi, > > I have gone through PIP but I don't see some basic information as part of > PIP: > 1. current issue in current load balancer strategy 2. Are there any performance and feat

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-192 New Pulsar Broker Load Balancer

Hi, I have gone through PIP but I don't see some basic information as part of PIP: 1. current issue in current load balancer strategy 2. Are there any performance and feature gaps in the current load balancer? Please provide data or metrics to show the impact. 3. what exactly we are solving in new

[DISCUSS] PIP-192 New Pulsar Broker Load Balancer

Dear Pulsar dev community, We would like to open a discussion here about PIP-192: New Pulsar Broker Load Balancer . Regards, Heesung