+1
Penghui
On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 23:07 Zixuan Liu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> #23757 makes replicateSubscriptionState nullable, which is important for
> supporting subscription replication on the namespace and topic levels.
>
> So I want to cherry-pick #23757 to the branch-3.0, branch-3.3, branch-4.
; propose ignoring the consumer configuration, ensuring that replication is
> controlled by the namespace or topic-level settings instead.
>
> Thanks,
> Zixuan
>
> PengHui Li 于2024年12月24日周二 09:01写道：
>
> > Hi Zixuan,
> >
> > Thanks for bringing the d
Hi Zixuan,
Thanks for bringing the discussion here. After going through the context
and discussions
from https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23770 and
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23769.
It looks like we can improve the option "replicateSubscriptionState" to
make it only work for the ne
Hi Yubiao,
Thanks for driving this fix. Based on the LTS version strategy, user should
able to upgrade from 3.0 to 4.0 without and compatibility issues and
downgrade from 4.0 to 3.0 without any compatibility issues.
https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/release-policy/#compatibility-between-releas
+1
I also had many questions during the discussion with Pulsar users.
It's not easy to understand why their consumers get a lot of duplicated
messages with batch messages without any consumer or broker restarts.
Regards
Penghui
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 4:45 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wro
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Build from source
- Passed our internal tests
Regards,
Penghui
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:08 AM Nicolò Boschi wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified the checksums and signatures
> - Built sources with JDK21
> - Ran tests using the provided d
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature of the binary release artifacts
- Start Pulsar standalone
- Verified Produce and Consume
- Verified Pulsar Function and Stateful Function
- Verified the Cassandra connector
Regards,
Penghui
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 9:55 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hello Apache Pu
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature of the binary release artifacts
- Start Pulsar standalone
- Verified Produce and Consume
- Verified Pulsar Function and Stateful Function
- Verified the Cassandra connector
Regards,
Penghui
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 8:37 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hello Apache Pu
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 11:36 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Mer 2 Ott 2024, 03:21 Matteo Merli ha scritto:
>
> > +1
> > --
> > Matteo Merli
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 5:03 PM Rajan Dhabalia
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:23 AM Zike Yang wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> BR,
> Zike Yang
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 11:52 PM Lari Hotari wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -Lari
> >
> > su 29. syysk. 2024 klo 13.10 guo jiwei kirjoitti:
> >
> > > Hi dev,
> > >I
+1 (binding)
- Verified checksum and signatures
- Tested producer and consumer
Regards,
Penghui
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 4:56 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified checksum and signatures
> - Built from source with Go 1.22
> - Ran the perf tools
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Fri, Sep 27
Thanks for driving the proposal.
I would like to share the related context that happened many years ago
- https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0r9kk0968ydpxtf16x6ql3x6kwy7dc1
- https://lists.apache.org/thread/hfv18cg0yckt5cqd0fc66rp7tth036kf
We have two major approaches:
1. Minimize the persistent
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 8:17 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 3:06 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -Lari
> >
> > On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 21:34, Heesung Sohn wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
Hi Lari,
I recommend creating a new implementation rather than directly replacing
the existing one.
This approach aligns with how we’ve handled several proposals in the past
and allows us to maintain stability while introducing improvements
- PIP-192: New Pulsar Broker Load Balancer
- PIP-195: Ne
+1 binding
Regards
Penghui
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 19:55 Yunze Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 2:15 PM Baodi Shi wrote:
> >
> > +1(binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Baodi Shi
> >
> > Bhat, Vinay 于2024年9月4日周三 12:22写道：
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I want to
+1
Thanks
Penghui
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 20:14 Lari Hotari wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Lari
>
> On 2024/09/05 02:53:22 Yunze Xu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I want to start a vote on PIP-376 Make topic policies pluggable.
> >
> > Proposal link: https://github.com/streamnative/pulsar/pull/307
> > D
Thanks for driving the proposal.
I support this proposal and left a few comments on the PR
Regards,
Penghui
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:54 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Nice write up !
>
> I generally support this proposal, we should have clearer APIs for the
> components we want to allow users to
+1 (binding)
Sorry for the late response on the mailing list.
Regards,
Penghui
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 7:44 PM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
> The vote is approved with 4 binding votes and close now.
>
> Votes:
> - Hang Chen (binding)
> - Jiwei Guo (binding)
> - Lari Hotari (bindi
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature
- Verified the checksum
Regards,
Penghui
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:09 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Validated source artifacts
> - checked sha512 checksum
> - checked signature
>
> Validated binaries
> - ran sample app
>
> -Lari
>
> On 2024/08/1
Hi Yubiao,
Thanks for driving the improvements to Pulsar.
The motivation and the high-level solution look good to me.
I just left some comments on the proposal for the details.
The major idea for resolving this issue is to separate the user-facing
topic auto-creation
and topic auto-creation by da
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature of the binary release artifacts
- Start Pulsar standalone
- Verified Produce and Consume
- Verified Pulsar Function and Stateful Function
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Ran the perf test with 100 topics and batch disabled
Regards,
Penghui
On Tue, Jul 30
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature of the binary release artifacts
- Start Pulsar standalone
- Verified Produce and Consume
- Verified Pulsar Function and Stateful Function
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Ran the perf test with 100 topics and batch disabled
Regards,
Penghui
On Tue, Jul 30
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature of the binary release artifacts
- Start Pulsar standalone
- Verified Produce and Consume
- Verified Pulsar Function and Stateful Function
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Ran the perf test with 100 topics and batch disabled
Regards,
Penghui
On Tue, Jul 3
+1 (binding)
Thanks for driving the proposal.
Regards,
Penghui
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 6:46 PM Kai Wang wrote:
> Hi all, I want to start a vote on PIP-366: Support to specify different
> config for Configuration and Local Metadata Store.
>
> You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apac
+1 (binding)
- Verified checksum
- Verified signatures
Thanks,
Penghui
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 8:29 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified checksum and signatures
> - Built from source
> - Verified the binaries
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 3:23 AM Chris Bono wrote
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 5:05 AM Dragos Misca
wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Thank you,
> Dragos
>
> > On May 30, 2024, at 5:47 PM, Hang Chen wrote:
> >
> > Hi, all
> >
> > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-355: Enhancing
> > Broker-Level Metrics for Puls
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 3:25 PM thetumbled wrote:
> The vote is approved with 3 binding votes and close now.
> Votes:
> - Kai Wang(non-binding)
> - Yunze Xu(binding)
> - guo jiwei(binding)
> - Yubiao Feng(binding)
>
> Thank you all for verifying and voting!
> Wenzhi
Hi Wenzhi,
Thanks for driving the proposal.
The old configuration name should not be removed directly.
It might break users when they upgrade to the new cluster.
Instead, we can move it to the `Deprecated settings` section
and use `-1` as the default value. If the user sets it to a positive numbe
+1 (binding)
- Build from source
- Checked the signatures
- Run standalone
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Verified the Stateful function
- Run pulsar-perf with 100 topics and batch disabled
Regards,
Penghui
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 8:32 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> Sorry for the confus
Sorry for the confusion.
After checking more details, the fix makes more sense. For more cases, user
think it's a bug if you can grant permission to a non-existent topic.
I will verify this release today.
Thanks,
Penghui
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 4:33 PM PengHui Li wrote:
> Hi Cong,
&g
Hi Cong,
Thanks for driving the release.
This PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22547 has changed the
behavior of
permission operations on a topic.
The issue is it will break the user's case which relies on the lazy
auto-creation of the topic.
They can grant permission to the topic but the
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:24 AM Kai Wang wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Kai
>
+1 (binding)
- Build from the source code
- Checked the signatures
- Start the standalone
- Run the perf tests
Penghui
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 1:33 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Build from source
> - Checked the signatures
> - Start standalone
> - Verified producers and consumers
>
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 5:50 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno mar 14 mag 2024 alle ore 11:31 太上玄元道君 ha
> scritto:
>
> > +1 nonbinding
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tao Jiuming
> >
> > thetumbled 于2024年5月14日 周二17:26写道：
> >
> > > Hi, Pulsar Co
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:58 PM Zixuan Liu wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Zixuan
>
> Yubiao Feng 于2024年5月8日周三 18:22写道：
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Yubiao Feng
> >
> > On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 11:25 AM Hang Chen wrote:
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
+1 (binding)
Penghui
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 8:27 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno mer 8 mag 2024 alle ore 12:51 Zike Yang ha
> scritto:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zike Yang
> >
> > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:22 PM Yubiao Feng
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +
For the backlog quota check, I think we also need the same capacity.
For configurable. I think the reason is users can have their plugins running
with the broker which relies on the Pulsar topic. They don't want the
application to
change the TTL or backlog policies for some subscription/cursor. Bu
LGTM,
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:02 PM Lari Hotari wrote:
> LGTM, very useful. Thanks for driving this.
>
> -Lari
>
> On 2024/05/04 16:01:41 Hang Chen wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I proposed a new proposal to improve the TTL impact on system
> > cursors. Please help take a look, t
+1
Thanks for driving the release.
Penghui
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 8:17 PM Cong Zhao wrote:
> Hi community,
> It has been more than three months since the release of 3.2.0. we now
> have more than 280 commits
> <
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A3.3.0+is%3Amerged+
Hi, all
I would like to start a discussion to cherry-pick
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19236
to the release branches
- branch-3.0
- branch-2.11
- branch-2.10
The topic load is a critical operation in Pulsar. If the topic
not able to be loaded, the producer or consumer will not
able to c
The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited
Zike Yang https://github.com/RobertIndie to join the PMC,
and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
Zike Yang is actively driving the Golang client release, contributing to
multiple
Pulsar repos, Golang client, CPP Client,
The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited
Baodi Shi https://github.com/shibd to join the PMC,
and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
Baodi Shi is actively driving the NodeJS client release, contributing to
multiple
Pulsar repos, Nodejs client, CPP Client, Pytho
It sounds good to me.
Regards,
Penghui
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 9:05 PM Baodi Shi wrote:
> Hi, xiangying.
>
> I agree with cherry-picking the historical branch. This change in behavior
> is as expected, and it can indeed be understood as a bug.
>
> We can cherry-pick them all together after fixi
+1 (binding)
- Build from source
- Checked the signatures
- Start standalone
- Verified producers and consumers
- Verified Cassandra connect
- Verified Stateful function
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:49 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Built from source
> - Checked the sign
+1 (binding)
- Verified the signatures
- Built from source on macOS m2 pro
- Ran the producer and consumer
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:45 AM guo jiwei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified checksum and signatures
> - Built from source on macOS m1
> - Ran the tests
>
> Regards
> Ji
Hi all,
I want to start a discussion to cherry-pick #21816[0] to release branches.
This PR added the metrics for the time-based backlog, which is introduced
in
2.8.0 [1]. However, there has always been a lack of relevant indicators to
assist users in daily monitoring work. It becomes a blocker for
Hi, Lari
Thanks for driving the discussion, and I agree that the cherry-picking is
the pain
especially when we need to maintain old branches for a long time.
Frankly, my first impression is to target the bug fix to branch-3.0, but
the features and
improvements to the master branch will burden the
er add entries complete, add a index to `ManagedLedgerIndex` and
> store the index to ML. What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Tao Jiuming
>
>
>
> PengHui Li 于2024年3月25日周一 15:17写道：
>
> > Hi, Jiuming
> >
> > I'm sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
&g
Hi, Yubiao
It's better to list the names of the 3 bindings.
Thanks,
Penghui
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 4:58 PM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
> Close the vote with 3(binding).
>
> Thanks
> Yubiao Feng
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 6:28 AM Yubiao Feng
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > This thread is to start a vo
on
> * PengHui
> * Matteo
>
> Non-Binding +1s:
> * Dao Jun
> * Apurva
> * Asaf
> * Zixuan
>
>
> Thanks,
> Matteo
>
>
> --
> Matteo Merli
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:54 PM Zixuan Liu wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> &g
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature
- Installed the wheel on macOS with Python 3.12
- Run the consume and produce examples
Regards,
Penghui
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:55 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
> This is the 2nd release candidate for Apache Pulsar Client Python,
> version 3.5.0.
>
> It fixes the f
The labels updates:
- Removed the `java` label. We only have a few legacy PRs labeled with
`java`.
- Changed `component/*` to `area/*`
- Deprecated `question` label
- Changed `PIP` to `type/PIP`
- Changed `flaky-test` to `type/flaky-test`
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 3:17 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
Yes, the PR is welcome.
Best,
Penghui
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 3:08 PM Kiryl Valkovich
wrote:
> Hi PengHui,
> Sure. If the PR is welcome here, I’ll submit it in a few days.
>
>
> Best,
> Kiryl
>
> > On Mar 25, 2024, at 6:07 AM, PengHui Li wrote:
> >
>
Hi, Jiuming
I'm sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
First, I support the motivation to optimize this case because it could be a
significant
blocker for users who want infinite data retention, which is a BIG
differentiator
with Apache Kafka. And, I really saw the cases with high publish
thro
+1
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:54 AM Baodi Shi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar Node.js client v1.11.0
>
> Due to Node.js's dependency on the CPP client, and considering that CPP
> client version 3.5.0 has introduced many features and fixed numer
Hi Kiryl,
Thanks for your suggestions, and they are looking good to me
I'll follow your suggestions on renaming or deprecating the labels.
For the label automation, do you want to push a PR to add it?
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 9:39 PM Kiryl Valkovich
wrote:
> Comment with bett
+1 (binding)
Regards.
Penghui
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 6:28 AM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> This thread is to start a vote for PIP-344.
>
> PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22182
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/z693blcxoqk0mj0rzyt1k7nvy72j18t5
>
> Thanks
> Yub
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signature
- Tested the pre-build binaries on Mac (m2 pro)
Regards,
Penghui
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 9:12 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified checksum and signatures
> - Built from source on macOS m1
> - Upgrade the dependency of the python client and veri
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 2:32 AM Asaf Mesika wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 8:29 PM Apurva Telang
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 2:12 AM mattison chao
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:17 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> The proposal overall LGTM. But since the PIP itself and its
> implementation are coupled in the same PR, I left minor comments in
> that PR directly, which does not affect my +1.
>
> Thanks,
> Yunz
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signatures
- Build from the source
- Checked the bookkeeper JNI libs
org.apache.bookkeeper-circe-checksum-*.jar and
org.apache.bookkeeper-cpu-affinity-*.jar
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Verified the Stateful Function
- Verified the Trino connector
- Tested perfor
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signatures
- Build from the source
- Checked the bookkeeper JNI libs
org.apache.bookkeeper-circe-checksum-*.jar and
org.apache.bookkeeper-cpu-affinity-*.jar
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Verified the Stateful Function
- Verified the Trino connector
- Tested perfor
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signatures
- Build from the source
- Checked the bookkeeper JNI libs
org.apache.bookkeeper-circe-checksum-*.jar and
org.apache.bookkeeper-cpu-affinity-*.jar
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Verified the Stateful Function
- Verified the Trino connector
- Tested perfor
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signatures
- Build from the source
- Checked the bookkeeper JNI libs
org.apache.bookkeeper-circe-checksum-*.jar and
org.apache.bookkeeper-cpu-affinity-*.jar
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Verified the Stateful Function
- Verified the Trino connector
- Tested perfor
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signatures
- Build from the source
- Checked the bookkeeper JNI libs
org.apache.bookkeeper-circe-checksum-*.jar and
org.apache.bookkeeper-cpu-affinity-*.jar
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Verified the Stateful Function
- Verified the Trino connector
- Tested perfor
+1 (binding)
- Checked the signatures
- Build and Run the local test.
Regards,
Penghui
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 12:55 PM Matteo Merli wrote:
> +1
>
> Verified checksums and signatures
> Verified tests and local perf client
>
> --
> Matteo Merli
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 9:23 PM Yunze Xu w
Hi Girish,
I have updated the Pulsar website
https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/release-policy/
```
3.0 -> 4.0 -> 3.0 is OK;
3.2 -> 4.0 -> 3.2 is OK;
3.2 -> 4.4 -> 3.2 is OK;
3.0 -> 3.1 -> 3.0 is OK;
3.0 -> 3.2 -> 3.0 is OK;
3.2 -> 5.0 is not OK.
```
Regards,
Penghui
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 7:40 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:14 AM 太上玄元道君 wrote:
>
> > +1 nonbinding
> >
> > Zixuan Liu 于2024年3月6日 周三23:04写道：
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > A new proposal to improve t
+1 (binding)
- Built from source
- Checked the signatures
- Run standalone
- Checked producer and consumer
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Verified the Stateful function
Regards,
Penghui
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 3:38 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Built from source
> - Checked the
Congratulations!
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:35 AM Kalwit S wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 3:13 PM ZhangJian He wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > Thanks
> > ZhangJian He
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 5:17 AM Enrico Olivelli
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Congratulations!
> >
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:54 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> -Lari
>
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 23:48, Matteo Merli wrote:
> >
> > Opening the vote thread for PIP-324: Alpine Docker images
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21716
> >
> > WIP PR:
Yes, it’s better to bump a protocol version to keep the compatibility.
Regards,
Penghui
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 16:13 Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il Gio 29 Feb 2024, 08:46 PengHui Li ha scritto:
>
> > +1 for the motivation
> >
> > We should not create partiti
>
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:18 AM Zike Yang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > +1 (no-binding)
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > BR,
> > >
> > > > Zike Yang
> > &g
+1 for the motivation
We should not create partitioned topics when calling
`pulsarClient.getPartitionsForTopic`
The tricky part is the broker doesn't know if the partition metadata
getting request is from create produce/consumer or just from
pulsarClient.getPartitionsForTopic(topicName).
We can
Congrats, Asaf.
Penghui Li
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:17 PM Cong Zhao wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> Thanks,
> Cong
>
> On 2024/02/20 16:50:29 Lari Hotari wrote:
> > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited
> > Asaf Mesika https://github.c
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 5:44 PM Pengcheng Jiang
wrote:
> Hi, community
>
> I'm starting the vote for PIP-339: Introducing the --log-topic Option for
> Pulsar Sinks and Sources
> PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22071
>
> Thanks,
> Pengcheng Jiang
>
+1
Thanks for driving the release.
And it should be the last patch release of Apache Pulsar 3.1.0
Then, we will move to 3.2.x
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 8:08 PM ran leon wrote:
> Dear the Apache Pulsar Dev community,
>
> I would like to propose releasing Apache Pulsar 3.1.3.
>
>
+1 (binding)
- Deploy pulsar cluster on local docker-desktop(with Kubernetes)
- Checked the signature
- Checked the license
Regards,
Penghui
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 3:38 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hello Apache Pulsar Community,
>
> This is a call for the vote to release the Apache Pulsar Helm Cha
> It would be nice to just have the config library to read the environment
variables directly, instead of having to write them down in the file.
I guess it should be easy to have it with the existing homegrown
configuration solution
without completely moving to a new lib.
For the other points suc
Do we need to take the authorization into account?
Users might need to take one more step to grant permission to access the
log topic.
It is better to mention it in the proposal.
If users try to use one log topic for multiple functions,
Is it easy for them to distinguish which function the logs ar
+1 Great user experience improvement.
Regards,
Penghui
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 3:15 AM Zixuan Liu wrote:
> > Can you please share some pointers ?
>
> Only `org.apache.pulsar.shell.ShellCommandsProvider#getJCommander` uses
> jcommander API. I need to use picocli instead of jcommander, or add a n
Created a PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/795 to improve the
doc.
Regards,
Penghui
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 8:56 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> There is a question from Girish in the Pulsar Slack channel [0] asking if
> users can
> upgrade to the latest feature release from the LT
t-cpp/pull/394
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 8:57 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Built from source
> > - Checked the signatures
> > - Run standalone
> > - Checked producer and consumer
> > - Verified
+1
Best,
Penghui
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 7:58 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22009
>
> ===
>
> # PIP-335: Supporty Oxia metadata store plugin
>
> # Motivation
>
> Oxia is a scalable metadata store and coordination system that can be used
> as the core infr
+1 (binding)
- Built from source
- Checked the signatures
- Run standalone
- Checked producer and consumer
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Verified the Stateful function
Regards,
Penghui
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 11:40 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> This is the fifth release candidate for Apache Pul
There is a question from Girish in the Pulsar Slack channel [0] asking if
users can
upgrade to the latest feature release from the LTS version directly.
For example, from 3.0.0 to 3.2.0 (3.1.0 is skipped)
The documentation[1] doesn't have a clear answer for this
```
3.0 -> 4.0 -> 3.0 is OK;
3.2
+1
BTW, instead of having a random key, can we just dispatch the messages
without a key
in the round-robin fashion? It just works like the Shared subscription.
Regards,
Penghui
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 2:32 AM Yubiao Feng
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> ### Background
> Regarding Key_Shared mode, messages
+1 (binding)
- Built from source
- Checked the signatures
- Run standalone
- Checked producer and consumer
- Verified the Cassandra connector
- Verified the Stateful function
Regards,
Penghui
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 11:15 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> This is the fifth release candidate for Apache Pul
Hi Dalaji,
It sounds good to me.
And I think you can start to draft the PIP and move to the vote stage.
Regards,
Penghui
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 3:33 AM Balaji Lakshmanan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently we are able to peek at any number of messages using the Pulsar
> Java Admin API.
>
> However, w
+1
Thanks for driving the release.
Penghui
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:08 AM Baodi Shi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar Node.js client v1.10.0
>
> It has been over 5 months since the last release (1.9.0). There have
> been many new features and bug fixes since th
+1 (binding)
- Deploy pulsar cluster on local docker-desktop(with Kubernetes)
- Checked the signature
- Checked the license
Regards,
Penghui
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 4:45 PM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hello Apache Pulsar Community,
>
> This is a call for the vote to release the Apache Pulsar Helm Cha
+1 (binding)
- Build from source
- Run tests on 3.1.2
- Run tests on 3.0.2
Regards,
Penghui
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:59 PM Zike Yang wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version
> 0.12.0, as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not
`brokerInterceptors`
> config clearly to say TTL might not work if
> `AppendBrokerTimestampMetadataInterceptor` is not configured.
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:41 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think we should provide such an opt
It looks like something broke the behavior of the querystate from Pulsar
Functions.
1. The querystate exit with `Reason: key 'hello' doesn't exist`, which the
old version will not exit
```
lipenghui@lipenghuis-MacBook-Pro apache-pulsar-3.2.0 % bin/pulsar-admin
functions querystate --tenant test -
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:03 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 6:55 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 5:39 PM 太上玄元道君 wrote:
> >
> >
ssue will not damage the data or cause the data loss.
You can monitor it, to skip the backlogs. TTL is not the only way to evict
backlogs.
Thanks,
Penghui
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:33 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> > We should also improve the TTL:
> > When client publish time > Ledger c
= Ledger create time + Ledger rollover time.
> >
> > This change can make sure entry expired when client clock is not right.
> >
> > On 2024/01/17 04:31:16 PengHui Li wrote:
> > > > User disabling `AppendBrokerTimestampMetadataInterceptor` does not
> mean
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 4:00 PM guo jiwei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:41 PM Xiangying Meng
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Pulsar community,
> >
> > I am initiating a voting thread for "PIP-321: Split the responsibili
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:05 AM guo jiwei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 5:50 PM Zixuan Liu wrote:
>
> > +1(non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zixuan
> >
> > Zike Yang 于2024年1月15日周一 16:14写道：
> >
> > > Hi, all
>
s follows:
>
> BrokerPublishTime > BrokerTimestamp
>
> If `BrokerPublishTime` exists, `BrokerReceiveTime` is not set.
> If not, we set `BrokerReceiveTime` and is no longer affected by client
> time.
>
> On 2024/01/15 02:15:17 PengHui Li wrote:
> > IMO, we should enable
1 - 100 of 970 matches
Mail list logo
