Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.0 Release Candidate 3

Observed a potential blocking issue related to broker configuration: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12764 On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 5:14 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > I am investigating a potential regression regarding to Transactions > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12754 > > Ple

Attention: migration steps for multiple advertised listeners in 2.9

d some surprising effects (see above PR for a detailed description and mitigation steps). Prepare for those effects to be undone in 2.9. Thanks, Eron Wright

Re: Release 2.9.0....adding more PRs ? please don't

Thanks Enrico for the extra efforts there, I know my PRs were late to merge. -Eron On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:58 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hello, > I see that someone is adding PRs to Milestone 30 (Pulsar 2.9.0) > > we are pretty late on starting the release > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/

Re: [PIP 102] Pulsar Watermarking

gt; - tooling to support operations (reset/inspect...) > > > Thanks for contributing this precious feature that is missing in Pulsar. > > Best regards > Enrico > > Il Sab 2 Ott 2021, 22:41 Eron Wright ha > scritto: > > > Hi, > > I've created PIP 102 to

[PIP 102] Pulsar Watermarking

pe on this idea, and will post more materials as they become available: https://pulsar-summit.org/en/event/europe-2021/sessions/pulsar-watermarking Looking forward to discussing this idea with the Pulsar community! Eron Wright StreamNative

Re: [VOTE] [PIP 95] Smart Listener Selection with Multiple Bind Addresses

Seems we have a consensus to accept, thanks everyone. On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:10 PM PengHui Li wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Penghui > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 10:19 AM Fangbin Sun wrote: > > > +1(non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Fangbin &

[VOTE] [PIP 95] Smart Listener Selection with Multiple Bind Addresses

Dear Pulsar community, please vote now on PIP 95: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12040 Note that there are numerous proposals that have been labeled as PIP 95. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- Eron Wright StreamNative

Re: [PIP 95] Smart Listener Selection with Multiple Bind Addresses

Re-upping this discussion. Seems like the community is ready to accept the proposal, any objections? Thanks! Eron Wright On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:23 AM Eron Wright wrote: > Hi, > I've created PIP 95 to improve multi-listener support to automatically > select the appropria

Re: Problems with PIP ID Management

It is funny that we have four unrelated PIP-95 proposals. By the above principle, the true PIP 95 is "Smart Listener Selection with Multiple Bind Addresses". :) On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:47 AM Michael Marshall wrote: > Hi Enrico, > > Thank you for raising this concern. Apparently acquiring a

[PIP 95] Smart Listener Selection with Multiple Bind Addresses

Hi, I've created PIP 95 to improve multi-listener support to automatically select the appropriate listener in topic lookups based on the service endpoint. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12040 I'll post a draft PR shortly for further discussion. Please take a look, thanks