[ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 3.3.0 released

2024-06-06 Thread Cong Zhao
The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 3.3.0 Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics, guaranteed at-least-once delivery of messages, automatic cursor management for subscr

Re: [VOTE] PIP-357: Correct the conf name in load balance module.

2024-06-06 Thread PengHui Li
+1 (binding) Regards, Penghui On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 3:25 PM thetumbled wrote: > The vote is approved with 3 binding votes and close now. > Votes: > - Kai Wang(non-binding) > - Yunze Xu(binding) > - guo jiwei(binding) > - Yubiao Feng(binding) > > Thank you all for verifying and voting! > Wenzhi

Re: [VOTE] PIP-357: Correct the conf name in load balance module.

2024-06-06 Thread thetumbled
The vote is approved with 3 binding votes and close now. Votes: - Kai Wang(non-binding) - Yunze Xu(binding) - guo jiwei(binding) - Yubiao Feng(binding) Thank you all for verifying and voting! Wenzhi Feng. On 2024/06/06 07:19:34 Yubiao Feng wrote: > +1 binding > > Thanks > Yubiao Feng > > On We

Re: [VOTE] PIP-357: Correct the conf name in load balance module.

2024-06-06 Thread Yubiao Feng
+1 binding Thanks Yubiao Feng On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 10:33 AM thetumbled wrote: > Hi, Pulsar Community. > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-357: Correct the conf > name in load balance module. > Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22823 > Implementation PR: h

Re: [VOTE] PIP-357: Correct the conf name in load balance module.

2024-06-06 Thread guo jiwei
+1 (binding) Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 3:05 PM Yunze Xu wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Yunze > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 6:25 PM thetumbled wrote: > > > > Hi PengHui, > > The current design is not to remove the old one directly, but deprecate > it. We are still comp

Re: [VOTE] PIP-357: Correct the conf name in load balance module.

2024-06-06 Thread Yunze Xu
+1 (binding) Thanks, Yunze On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 6:25 PM thetumbled wrote: > > Hi PengHui, > The current design is not to remove the old one directly, but deprecate it. > We are still comptible with the old cluster in following way: > - If a configuration is not the default configuration, use