bithavoc commented on issue #472:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/472#issuecomment-1185848048
It's more than just those two tables:
```
; ]; ERROR: null value in column "bookie" of relation "environments"
violates not-null constraint
Detail: Failing row co
bithavoc opened a new issue, #472:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/issues/472
Docs are broken for 0.2.0 since
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/456 was merged
> Initialize database and table structures using the
[file](https://github.com/apache/pulsar-ma
SignorMercurio opened a new pull request, #147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/147
This PR works together with apache/pulsar#16627. Please see more details
there.
I'm aware that this PR includes doc changes that should only happen in
[apache/pulsar](https://github.co
Hi devs,
*Backgorund*
In the past few weeks I pay some time on Pulsar SQL or name it Pulsar Trino
connector.
I noticed in Trino community our committer Marvin (@xxc) ever submitted a
PR to contribute the connector to upstream[1]. However, due to the huge
version gap and lack of time to spend on
Hi,
I'm happy to conclude that the proposal[1] is passed with 14 +1 votes, 0
objections.
6 binding votes:
liuyu
eolivelli
wave
mmerli
penghui
zixuan
8 non-binding votes:
technoboy
Qiang Huang
zike
Anon Hxy
mmarshall
Max Xu
Haiting Jiang
tison
Thank everyone.
Best,
tison.
[1] https://lists.apa
+1
Thanks for voting for this proposal. I'll send a result mail and notify
INFRA team to move forward.
Best,
tison.
Haiting Jiang 于2022年7月14日周四 16:15写道：
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Haiting
>
> On 2022/07/12 10:00:27 tison wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the previous email[1] I started a discussion about ena
Hi all,
Long days ago I opened a PR to support cumulative acknowledgement
for C++ client, but it's controversial about whether should a
partitioned consumer acknowledge a message ID cumulatively.
See https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6796 for discussion.
Currently, the Java client acknowledg
Thanks for driving this initiative.
I think that it is better to not add a configuration flag for this feature.
Because:
- it is always a good idea to not create a batch message
- everybody will have to turn this feature explicitly on, otherwise
there is no benefit
- it is very hard to explain wh
Hi Pulsar community:
I open a pip to discuss "No batching if only one message in batch"
Proposal Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16619
---
## Motivation
The original discussion mail :
https://lists.apache.org/thread/5svpl5qp3bfoztf5fvtojh51zbklcht2
linked issue: https://github.c
Hi Pulsar Community
I would like to start a VOTE on "PIP-184: Topic specific consumer
priorityLevel".
The proposal can be read at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16481
and the discussion thread is available at
https://lists.apache.org/thread/5zs4gd3r0rtzz16nv62o8ntygg01qjhq
Voting will
+1
It allows users to only have one consumer but with different priority
levels for different topics.
Penghui
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 4:18 PM Dave Maughan
wrote:
> Hi Zike,
>
> > What about using the Pattern type to store the compiled Pattern in the
> TopicConsumerConfigurationData?
>
> Thanks
11 matches
Mail list logo
