Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.0 Candidate 2

Penghui, Thanks Il Mar 2 Nov 2021, 04:31 PengHui Li ha scritto: > The non-persistent partitioned topic with geo-replicated enabled is not > working in 2.9.0 rc2, > I will hold the result until you complete your investigations Enrico I have tested on 2.8.1, it works. But for 2.9.0 when I cr

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.0 Candidate 2

The non-persistent partitioned topic with geo-replicated enabled is not working in 2.9.0 rc2, I have tested on 2.8.1, it works. But for 2.9.0 when I create a non-persistent partitioned topic, I will get a timeout exception ``` bin/pulsar-admin topics create-partitioned-topic non-persistent://publi

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.7.0 Candidate 1

+1 Validated * Checksum * Build from source * CLI produce/consume tools Matteo -- Matteo Merli On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 3:08 PM Chris Kellogg wrote: > > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.7.0, > as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [

Re: [Discuss] Let the client perceive the rate limit

If the producer has been throttled, we should return the exception to the user after exceeding the publish timeout. Otherwise, if a producer has been throttled for 1ms, the producer failed all the pending messages(ordering guarantee), this might introduce confusion and might introduce more workload

Re: [VOTE] PIP 106: Negative acknowledgment backoff

+1 (binding) Thanks, Hang r...@apache.org 于2021年11月1日周一 下午7:42写道： > > +1 (non-binding) > > And the Impl refer to: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12566, PTAL > > -- > Thanks > Xiaolong Ran > > linlin 于2021年11月1日周一 下午5:59写道： > > > +1 > > > > Enrico Olivelli 于2021年11月1日周一 下午5:47写道： > > > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP 106: Negative acknowledgment backoff

+1 (non-binding) And the Impl refer to: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12566, PTAL -- Thanks Xiaolong Ran linlin 于2021年11月1日周一 下午5:59写道： > +1 > > Enrico Olivelli 于2021年11月1日周一 下午5:47写道： > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thanks > > Enrico > > > > Il Lun 1 Nov 2021, 09:50 PengHui Li ha scr

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Client Go Release 0.7.0 Candidate 1

+1 (non-binding) - Validate pub/sub - Validate SHA-512 checksums -- Thanks Xiaolong Ran Chris Kellogg 于2021年11月1日周一 上午6:08写道： > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.7.0, > as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the rele

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.0 Candidate 2

+1 (non-binding) 1. Validate Pub/Sub and Java Functions 2. Validate Connectors 3. Validate Stateful Functions 4. Validate the sha512 checksums and gpg signatures 5. Validate Go SDK pub/sub -- Thanks Xiaolong Ran Massimiliano Mirelli 于2021年11月1日周一 上午5:57写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > Verified: > >

Re: List all topics

Hello Enrico and Devin: Here I have a concern. Assuming that there are many topics in your cluster, will this request keep failing? In a production environment, in fact, I see the current phenomenon is that if there are 20w sub-partitioned topics under a namespace, when you execute bin/pulsar-adm

Re: [VOTE] PIP 106: Negative acknowledgment backoff

+1 Enrico Olivelli 于2021年11月1日周一 下午5:47写道： > +1 (binding) > > > Thanks > Enrico > > Il Lun 1 Nov 2021, 09:50 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > > I would like to start a VOTE for PIP 106: Negative acknowledgment > backoff > > > > The issue for this PIP is here > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/

[Discuss] Let the client perceive the rate limit

Hi all: Now, Broker limits the rate of producing messages by setting `channel.setAutoRead(false)`. But no exception is returned to the client, or any log is printed, which makes it very difficult for us to troubleshoot the problem. The client timeout when sending messages and the connection will b

Re: Size of Asf-site branch in Pulsar repo

+1 Enrico Olivelli 于2021年10月30日周六 下午6:16写道： > Il Ven 29 Ott 2021, 21:27 Dave Fisher ha scritto: > > > Hi - > > > > > On Oct 29, 2021, at 12:02 PM, Matteo Merli wrote: > > > > > > The Pulsar website is getting published through a CI job that updates > > > the generated HTML files and commits th

Re: [VOTE] PIP 106: Negative acknowledgment backoff

+1 (binding) Thanks Enrico Il Lun 1 Nov 2021, 09:50 PengHui Li ha scritto: > I would like to start a VOTE for PIP 106: Negative acknowledgment backoff > > The issue for this PIP is here > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12379 > > Please VOTE within 72 hours. > > - Penghui >

[VOTE] PIP 106: Negative acknowledgment backoff

I would like to start a VOTE for PIP 106: Negative acknowledgment backoff The issue for this PIP is here https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12379 Please VOTE within 72 hours. - Penghui ## Motivation Apache Pulsar supports the at-least-once message delivery seman

Pulsar Flaky test report 2021-11-01 for PR builds in CI

Dear Pulsar community members, Here's a report of the flaky tests in Pulsar CI during the observation period of 2021-10-04 - 2021-11-01 . The full report has been also updated to a Google Sheet, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/165FHpHjs5fHccSsmQM4beeg6brn-zfUjcrXf6xAu4yQ/edit?usp=sharing Te