chrisjohnson00 commented on issue #65:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/issues/65#issuecomment-894615515
+1
This would also fix the improper use of Prometheus as a deployment.
Prometheus needs to be a stateful set due to it's pvc.
--
This is an automated message from
Suppose you have about a million topics and your Pulsar cluster goes down
(say, ZK down). ..many millions of producers and consumers are now
anxiously awaiting the cluster to comeback. .. fun experience for the first
broker that comes up. Don't ask me how I know, ref blame
ServerCnx.java#L429
Responses inline as well
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 9:16 AM Ivan Kelly wrote:
> >For example, in the proposed scenario it's used "Events.LOOKUP".
> > There is a lot of context that would be missing there. Eg: is this an
> > HTTP or Protobuf lookup, did we log when the operation started or when
>
Liapin opened a new pull request #168:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/168
Fixes
Use Buffer::Copy instead of Buffer::New #163
Fix leak at MessageId::Serialize #160
Fix Leak in MessageId::ToString #159
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Serv
Inline
> In that scenario,
> should we block or fail fast and let the application decide which is what
> we do today? Also, should we distinguish between the two scenarios, i.e.
> broker sends the error vs client internally throws the error?
While I agree that the client limit is different to the
Currently, there are two ways to get the TooManyRequest errors in the
client.
1) The client enforces a maximum number of pending lookups:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-client/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/ClientCnx.java#L733
The max number can be set when cre
Another strangeness I've seen with partition metadata requests.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/ddb5fb0e062c2fe0967efce2a443a31f9cd12c07/pulsar-client/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/PulsarClientImpl.java#L886
It takes a backoff, and it does retries, but the opTimeoutMs variable
blankensteiner closed issue #82:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/82
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
blankensteiner commented on issue #84:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/84#issuecomment-894401433
Hi @Flipbed
Are you
[monitoring](https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/wiki/Monitoring) the
state?
You can also have a look at the
[sample](https://github.co
Thanks for the detailed feedback Matteo,
Responses inline.
> 1. I like the idea of using enum to identify an event, but I fear
> that the enum name itself will not be, in many cases, as expressive of
> the context as a complete phrase.
I'm not convinced by this. From just eyeballing one of our
Flipbed opened a new issue #84:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/84
Hi Everyone!
We have just started using DotPuslar and mostly it works great!
We are having an issue where we _think_ that our company network goes
offline for a while, and when coming bac
Hi Pulsar Community,
The latest Pulsar Weekly update is here! Welcome to check the Pulsar community
weekly update for 07/26, 2021 - 08/01, 2021.
First, we would like to thank the contributors of the following Github ID who
helped build Pulsar during the week:
frankxieke, massakam, Sunny-Island,
Hi Pulsar Community,
The latest Pulsar Weekly update is here! Welcome to check the Pulsar community
weekly update for 07/26, 2021 - 08/01, 2021.
First, we would like to thank the contributors of the following Github ID who
helped build Pulsar during the week:
> frankxieke, massakam, Sunny-Islan
13 matches
Mail list logo